Did Canada Kill Fast Track?

被引:6
作者
Anderson, Greg
机构
关键词
TRADE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-7709.2012.01044.x
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
Fast track procedures have been key institutional mechanisms for U.S. trade policy making for nearly three decades. In April 2008, the U.S. House of Representatives made a small change to rules for considering the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement that significantly undermined fast track. However, these actions are really the culmination of the erosion of the utility of fast track in managing U.S. trade policy in the context of the challenges brought by increased openness in the global economy. Those challenges were laid bare with the first major bilateral agreement considered under fast track rules, the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement in the late 1980s.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 624
页数:42
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Can someone please settle this dispute? Canadian softwood lumber and the dispute settlement mechanisms of the NAFTA and the WTO [J].
Anderson, G .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2006, 29 (05) :585-610
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1935, POLITICS PRESSURES T
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, HAS GLOBALIZATION GO
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT LAWYER
[5]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC PAPERS PRESID
[6]  
[Anonymous], INT TRADE J
[7]   A renaissance for US trade policy? [J].
Bergsten, CF .
FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 2002, 81 (06) :86-+
[8]  
BRADLEY, 1987, MASTERING WORLD EC H, P112
[9]  
BUSH, 1991, PUBLIC PAPERS PRESID, P212
[10]  
BUSH, 1991, PUBLIC PAPERS PRESID, P345