Assessment of a fully automated RPR assay (Mediace RPR) for serological diagnosis and follow-up of syphilis: a retrospective study

被引:3
作者
Leroy, Anne-Gaelle [1 ]
Robert, Manon [1 ]
Carpentier, Maxime [1 ]
Bastidon, Christophe [2 ]
Gautreau, Blandine [1 ]
Lefebvre, Maeva [3 ]
Bonnet, Benedicte [4 ]
Bernier, Claire [4 ]
Corveca, Stephane [1 ,5 ]
Guillouzouica, Aurelie [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Nantes Univ Hosp, Dept Microbiol, Nantes, France
[2] CHU Nantes Univ Hosp, Biochem Lab, Nantes, France
[3] CHU Nantes Hotel Dieu, Dept Infect Dis, Nantes, France
[4] CHU Nantes Univ Hosp, Ctr Prevent Infect & Transmissible Dis, Nantes, France
[5] Univ Nantes, INSERM, Nantes, France
关键词
Syphilis; Automated non-treponemal test; Rapid plasma reagin; Syphilis follow-up; Treponema pallidum; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115767
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study assessed the Mediace RPR assay, an automated RPR (aRPR), for syphilis diagnosis and serological follow-up.Methods: Serums from patients positively screened for syphilis between January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively selected. A focus was performed on patients with a serological follow-up after treat-ment and/or a reinfection. Serums were tested by both manual (mRPR) and aRPR tests. Categorical and Quantitative Agreements (CA and QA), and serological follow-up conclusions were analyzed.Results: 236 serums from 85 patients (99% of male, 66% of HIV-infected) were included. The overall QA was 54.2%. CA was low (79.7%) especially for samples with low RPR titers. No prozone effect was observed. Sero-logical follow-up after treatment led to similar conclusions, although aRPR titers often decreased faster. Over 26 episodes of reinfection, 4 (15.4%) were misdiagnosed with the aRPR.Conclusions: While the Mediace aRPR presents the advantages of an automated test, its poor sensitivity in low titers may limit its use. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [11] Clinical Performance of the BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR Assay at a Tertiary Medical Center with a High Rate of Syphilis
    Tesfazghi, Merih T.
    Anderson, Neil W.
    Gronowski, Ann M.
    Yarbrough, Melanie L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 57 (01)
  • [12] Tsuboi M, 2018, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V56, DOI [10.1128/JCM.01003-18, 10.1128/jcm.01003-18]
  • [13] Syphilis Laboratory Guidelines: Performance Characteristics of Nontreponemal Antibody Tests
    Tuddenham, Susan
    Katz, Samantha S.
    Ghanem, Khalil G.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 : S21 - S42