Comparison of Electronic Examinations using Adaptive Multiple-choice Questions and Constructed-response Questions

被引:1
|
作者
Stavroulakis, Peter J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Photopoulos, Panagiotis [1 ]
Ventouras, Errikos [4 ]
Triantis, Dimos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Attica, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Athens, Greece
[2] Amer Coll Greece, Dept Management & Int Business, Sch Business & Econ, Aghia Paraskevi, Greece
[3] Univ Piraeus, Sch Maritime & Ind Studies, Dept Maritime Studies, Piraeus, Greece
[4] Univ West Attica, Dept Biomed Engn, Athens, Greece
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION (CSEDU), VOL 1 | 2020年
关键词
Evaluation Methodologies; Adaptive Testing; Multiple-choice Questions; Electronic Examinations; RELIABILITY; COLLEGE; ONLINE; FORMAT;
D O I
10.5220/0009341603580365
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The use of computer-based examination systems offers advantages related to the reduction of human resource allocation and to gains in objectivity for the scoring process. Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are widely used in such systems; one of the main reasons that hamper their effectiveness, in comparison with constructed response questions (CRQ), is the influence of guessing. Considering limitations within previously proposed MCQs examination methods and scoring rules, in the present work a novel MCQs examination method is presented, termed 'adaptive' MCQs method. MCQs are divided into 3 categories, per difficulty level. The `path' that an examinee will follow is constituted by 3 phases, wherein a set of questions belonging to one of the three difficulty-categories, is appointed. The exact path followed is selected per the success level of the examinee in the preceding phase. The scoring provided by the adaptive MCQs examination method produced results that were statistically indistinguishable to the scoring produced by a traditional CRQ examination method. At the same time, both the scoring results of the adaptive MCQs examination and the scoring results of the CRQ examination differed significantly from those obtained by a generic `non-adaptive' MCQs examination.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 365
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of examination methods based on multiple-choice questions and constructed-response questions using personal computers
    Ventouras, Errikos
    Triantis, Dimos
    Tsiakas, Panagiotis
    Stergiopoulos, Charalampos
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 54 (02) : 455 - 461
  • [2] Comparison of oral examination and electronic examination using paired multiple-choice questions
    Ventouras, Errikos
    Triantis, Dimos
    Tsiakas, Panagiotis
    Stergiopoulos, Charalampos
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2011, 56 (03) : 616 - 624
  • [3] Comparing Multiple-Choice and Constructed Response Questions Applied to Engineering Courses
    Triantis, Dimos
    Ventouras, Errikos
    Leraki, Ioanna
    Stergiopoulos, Charalampos
    Stavrakas, Ilias
    Hloupis, George
    COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION, CSEDU 2014, 2015, 510 : 130 - 140
  • [4] CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE OR MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS FOR ASSESSING DECLARATIVE PROGRAMMING KNOWLEDGE? THAT IS THE QUESTION!
    Belo, Yolanda
    Moro, Sergio
    Martins, Antonio
    Ramos, Pedro
    Costa, Joana Martinho
    Esmerado, Joaquim
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION-INNOVATIONS IN PRACTICE, 2019, 18 : 153 - 170
  • [5] Quality assessment of multiple-choice questions
    Akram, Zareena
    Aman, Khaliq
    Waheed, Nomira
    Rahim, Shiekh Kashif
    Hanif, Fouzia
    Abdullah, Zainab
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2025, 50 (01): : 191 - 194
  • [6] Automated Assessment with Multiple-choice Questions using Weighted Answers
    Zampirolli, Francisco de Assis
    Batista, Valerio Ramos
    Rodriguez, Carla
    da Rocha, Rafaela Vilela
    Goya, Denise
    CSEDU: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION - VOL 1, 2021, : 254 - 261
  • [7] Generating Adequate Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions
    Zhang, Cheng
    Sun, Yicheng
    Chen, Hejia
    Wang, Jie
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KDIR), VOL 1, 2020, : 310 - 315
  • [8] COMPARISON OF ORAL EXAMINATION AND EXAMINATION METHODS BASED ON MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS USING PERSONAL COMPUTERS
    Triantis, Dimos
    Stergiopoulos, Charalampos
    Tsiakas, Panagiotis
    CSEDU 2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION, VOL II, 2009, : 13 - 18
  • [9] Using multiple-choice questions to evaluate in-depth learning of economics
    Buckles, S
    Siegfried, JJ
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2006, 37 (01): : 48 - 57
  • [10] Effect of faculty training on quality of multiple-choice questions
    Gupta, Piyush
    Meena, Pinky
    Khan, Amir Maroof
    Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar
    Singh, Tejinder
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED AND BASIC MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 10 (03) : 210 - 214