Giving and receiving autonomy support in a high-stakes sport context: A field-based experiment during the 2012 London Paralympic Games

被引:78
作者
Cheon, Sung Hyeon [1 ]
Reeve, Johnmarshall [2 ]
Lee, Jaewon [3 ]
Lee, Youngsun [4 ]
机构
[1] Kangwon Natl Univ, Div Sport Sci, Chuncheon Si 200701, Kangwon Do, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Dept Educ, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yongin Univ, Dept Educ, Div Special Educ, Yongin, South Korea
[4] Inha Univ, Dept Educ, Inchon, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Athletes with disabilities; Autonomy support; Coaching; Intervention; Motivating style; Paralympics; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; SCHOOL PHYSICAL-EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL NEED SATISFACTION; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; INTERPERSONAL STYLE; STUDENTS; TEACHERS; WELL; INTERVENTION; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.02.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: Recognizing that high-stakes competitions tend to pressure coaches toward a maladaptive controlling motivating style, we sought to evaluate the capacity of an intervention to help coaches adopt a more autonomy-supportive style as they and their athletes prepared for the 2012 London Paralympic Games. Design: We adopted a coach-focused experimental research design that longitudinally assessed coaches' and athletes' self-report, rater-scored, and objective dependent measures. Method: We randomly assigned 33 coaches and their 64 athletes from 10 sports into either an experimental or control group and assessed their motivation and functioning longitudinally. Results: In the control group, athletes and coaches both showed a significant longitudinal deterioration in all measures of motivation, engagement, and functioning. In the experimental group, none of the measures of motivation, engagement, and functioning deteriorated but, instead, were generally maintained. In terms of performance, athletes of coaches in the experimental group won significantly more Olympic medals than did athletes in the control group. Conclusion: Enacting an autonomy-supportive coaching style within the context of a high-stakes sports competition functioned as an antidote to coaches' otherwise situationally-induced controlling style. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 69
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HLM 7 HIERARCHICAL L
[2]   Coach Autonomy Support, Basic Need Satisfaction, and Intrinsic Motivation of Paralympic Athletes [J].
Banack, Hailey R. ;
Sabiston, Catherine M. ;
Bloom, Gordon A. .
RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2011, 82 (04) :722-730
[3]   Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct [J].
Barber, BK .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 67 (06) :3296-3319
[4]  
Bartholomew K., 2009, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, V2, P215, DOI [10.1080/17509840903235330, DOI 10.1080/17509840903235330]
[5]   Psychological Need Thwarting in the Sport Context: Assessing the Darker Side of Athletic Experience [J].
Bartholomew, Kimberley J. ;
Ntoumanis, Nikos ;
Ryan, Richard M. ;
Thogersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie .
JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 33 (01) :75-102
[6]   The Controlling Interpersonal Style in a Coaching Context: Development and Initial Validation of a Psychometric Scale [J].
Bartholomew, Kimberley J. ;
Ntoumanis, Nikos ;
Thogersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie .
JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 32 (02) :193-216
[7]   Cohesiveness, coach's interpersonal style and psychological needs: Their effects on self-determination and athletes' subjective well-being [J].
Blanchard, Celine M. ;
Amiot, Catherine E. ;
Perreault, Stephane ;
Vallerand, Robert J. ;
Provencher, Pierre .
PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2009, 10 (05) :545-551
[8]   Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation [J].
Chatzisarantis, Nikos L. D. ;
Hagger, Martin S. .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2009, 24 (01) :29-48
[9]  
Chen B., 2015, MOTIVATION EMOTION
[10]   A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students' amotivation [J].
Cheon, Sung Hyeon ;
Reeve, Johnmarshall .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 40 :99-111