Carbon sources influence the nitrate removal activity, community structure and biofilm architecture

被引:74
作者
Srinandan, C. S. [1 ,2 ]
D'souza, Glen [1 ,2 ]
Srivastava, Nidhi [3 ]
Nayak, Binaya Bhusan [4 ]
Nerurkar, Anuradha S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maharaja Sayajirao Univ Baroda, Dept Microbiol, Vadodara 390002, Gujarat, India
[2] Maharaja Sayajirao Univ Baroda, Ctr Biotechnol, Fac Sci, Vadodara 390002, Gujarat, India
[3] Natl Inst Virol, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[4] Cent Inst Fisheries Educ, Bombay, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Biofilm; Nitrate removal; Carbon source; Denitrification; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; NITROUS-OXIDE; DENITRIFICATION; NITRITE; IDENTIFICATION; METHANOL; ACCUMULATION; BACTERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.079
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Influence of the frequently used carbon sources in nitrate removal processes were evaluated in a lab-scale biofilm reactor. The NO3-N removal efficiency was in the order acetate > glucose > methanol > ethanol. Acetate-fed biofilm reduced nearly 100% NO3-N with negligible amount of NO2-N accumulation. Although 99% NO3-N was reduced in the glucose-fed biofilm, substantial NH3-N and NO2-N accumulated. Methanol-fed biofilm reduced 72% of NO3-N with accumulation of 2.2 mg L-1 of NO2-N, while biofilm formed in presence of ethanol showed 61% reduction in NO3-N although relatively higher ratio of denitrifiers were observed. Acetate and ethanol-fed biofilm displayed characteristic biofilm architecture with voids, but the former had relatively higher thickness and diffusion distance. In presence of glucose and methanol, a confluent biofilm without characteristic voids was formed. Pseudomonas sp. numerically dominated the acetate and ethanol-fed biofilm, while Enterobacter sp. and Methylobacillus sp., were abundant in glucose and methanol biofilms respectively. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 299
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   NITRATE AND NITRITE REDUCTIONS WITH ANAEROBIC SLUDGE USING VARIOUS CARBON-SOURCES - GLUCOSE, GLYCEROL, ACETIC-ACID, LACTIC-ACID AND METHANOL [J].
AKUNNA, JC ;
BIZEAU, C ;
MOLETTA, R .
WATER RESEARCH, 1993, 27 (08) :1303-1312
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Molecular Microbial Ecology
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, V19th
[4]  
Bent SJ, 2007, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V73, P2399, DOI 10.1128/AEM.02383-06
[5]   KINETIC EXPLANATION FOR ACCUMULATION OF NITRITE, NITRIC-OXIDE, AND NITROUS-OXIDE DURING BACTERIAL DENITRIFICATION [J].
BETLACH, MR ;
TIEDJE, JM .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1981, 42 (06) :1074-1084
[6]   Comparison of Denitrification Between Paracoccus sp and Diaphorobacter sp. [J].
Chakravarthy, Srinandan S. ;
Pande, Samay ;
Kapoor, Ashish ;
Nerurkar, Anuradha S. .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 165 (01) :260-269
[7]   Influence of C-sources on the denitrification rate of a high-nitrate concentrated industrial wastewater [J].
Constantin, H ;
Fick, M .
WATER RESEARCH, 1997, 31 (03) :583-589
[8]   MICROBIAL BIOFILMS [J].
COSTERTON, JW ;
LEWANDOWSKI, Z ;
CALDWELL, DE ;
KORBER, DR ;
LAPPINSCOTT, HM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 49 :711-745
[9]   EFFECTS OF BIOFILM STRUCTURES ON OXYGEN DISTRIBUTION AND MASS-TRANSPORT [J].
DEBEER, D ;
STOODLEY, P ;
ROE, F ;
LEWANDOWSKI, Z .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1994, 43 (11) :1131-1138
[10]   Design optimization of a self-cleaning moving-bed bioreactor for seawater denitrification [J].
Dupla, M ;
Comeau, Y ;
Parent, S ;
Villemur, R ;
Jolicoeur, M .
WATER RESEARCH, 2006, 40 (02) :249-258