Non-Medical prescribing policies: A global scoping review

被引:10
|
作者
Ecker, Sarah [1 ]
Joshi, Rohina [2 ,3 ]
Shanthosh, Janani [2 ]
Ma, Chenjuan [1 ]
Webster, Ruth [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, New York, NY USA
[2] UNSW, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] George Inst Global Hlth, Delhi, India
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Global health; Health policy; Drug prescriptions; Non-Medical prescribing; Access to care; Professional autonomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.04.015
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Authorizing health care providers other than physicians to prescribe medicines (i.e., nonmedical prescribing, NMP) has been used to improve access to healthcare in many countries. This paper aimed to identify the scope of policies facilitating NMP worldwide and investigate the relationship of such policies with a country's physician to population ratio and economic status. Methods: A hierarchical search strategy was used. First, we compiled a list of countries and territories (n = 216) based upon World Bank record. Then, we collected relevant information for each country by using country name combined with key terms in PubMed, Google, and World Health Organization (WHO) country pharmaceutical profiles. Countries' socio-economic status and physician to population ratio were determined using data from the World Bank. Results: Legislation allowing NMP was found for 117 of 216 (54%) countries and territories. The most prevalent policy identified was that of autonomous prescribing authority (59%). Countries with low or high incomes and those with low or high physician to population ratios (<1/1000 or >3/1000) had the highest concentration of policies for NMP rights. Conclusion: Despite the varied scope of relevant policies, NMP has been implemented in countries of varied income levels and physician to population ratios. Future research is warranted to empirically examine its impact on access to care. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 726
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Costs, consequences and value for money in non-medical prescribing: a scoping review
    Babashahi, Saeideh
    Carey, Nicola
    Jani, Yogini
    Hart, Kath
    Hounsome, Natalia
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [2] A Review of the Legitimacy and Benefit of Non-Medical Prescribing on a Global Scale
    Ecker, Sarah
    Ma, Chenjuan
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2020, 69 (03) : E160 - E160
  • [3] Models of social prescribing to address non-medical needs in adults: a scoping review
    Oster, Candice
    Skelton, Claire
    Leibbrandt, Richard
    Hines, Sonia
    Bonevski, Billie
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [4] Models of social prescribing to address non-medical needs in adults: a scoping review
    Candice Oster
    Claire Skelton
    Richard Leibbrandt
    Sonia Hines
    Billie Bonevski
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [5] Evaluation of non-medical prescribing
    Hale, Andrew R.
    Coombes, Ian D.
    Stowasser, Danielle A.
    Nissen, Lisa
    AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2011, 35 (01) : 36 - 36
  • [6] ‘Non-medical’ prescribing in glaucoma
    S A Vernon
    Eye, 2003, 17 : 7 - 8
  • [7] Non-medical prescribing in Australia
    Nissen, Lisa
    Kyle, Greg
    AUSTRALIAN PRESCRIBER, 2010, 33 (06) : 166 - 167
  • [8] The role of non-medical prescribing
    Draffan, J.
    LUNG CANCER, 2013, 79 : S45 - S46
  • [9] Use of non-medical cannabis in epilepsy: A scoping review
    Li, Jimmy
    Areal, Cassandra C.
    Toffa, Denahin Hinnoutondji
    Citherlet, Daphne
    Deacon, Charles
    Jutras-Aswad, Didier
    Keezer, Mark Robert
    Nguyen, Dang Khoa
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [10] 'Non-medical' prescribing in glaucoma
    Vernon, SA
    EYE, 2003, 17 (01) : 7 - 8