Using species distribution models only may underestimate climate change impacts on future marine biodiversity

被引:22
作者
Moullec, Fabien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Barrier, Nicolas [4 ]
Drira, Sabrine [4 ]
Guilhaumon, Francois [3 ,5 ]
Hattab, Tarek [4 ]
Peck, Myron A. [1 ]
Shin, Yunne-Jai [3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Royal Netherlands Inst Sea Res, Dept Coastal Syst, POB 59, NL-1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hamburg, Ctr Earth Syst Res & Sustainabil, Inst Marine Ecosyst & Fisheries Sci IFM, CEN, Grosse Elbstr 133, D-22767 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Montpellier, IFREMER, CNRS, MARBEC,IRD, Montpellier, France
[4] Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, MARBEC,IRD, Sete, France
[5] IRD, La Reunion, France
[6] Univ Cape Town, Marine Res MA RE Inst, Private Bag X3, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
[7] Univ Cape Town, Dept Biol Sci, Private Bag X3, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Beta diversity; Climate change; End-to-end model; Osmose model; Species distribution model; Mediterranean sea; FOOD-WEB STRUCTURE; BIOTIC INTERACTIONS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TROPHIC INTERACTIONS; MEDITERRANEAN SEA; RANGE SHIFTS; DIVERSITY; SCENARIOS; NICHE; UNCERTAINTIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109826
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In face of global changes, projecting and mapping biodiversity changes are of critical importance to support management and conservation measures of marine ecosystems. Despite the development of a wide variety of ecosystem models capable of integrating an increasing number of ecological processes, most projections of climate-induced changes in marine biodiversity are based on species distribution models (SDMs). These correlative models present a significant advantage when the lack of knowledge on the species physiology is counterbalanced by the availability of relevant environmental variables over the species geographical range. However, correlative SDMs neglect intra- and inter-specific interactions and thereby can lead to biased projections of changes in biodiversity distribution. To evaluate the influence of trophic interactions on projections of species richness and assemblage composition under climate change scenarios, we compared biodiversity projections derived from an ensemble of different SDMs to projections derived from a hybrid model coupling SDMs and a multispecies trophic model in the Mediterranean Sea. Our results show that accounting for trophic interactions modifies projections of future biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea. Under the RCP8.5 scenario, SDMs tended to overestimate the gains and underestimate the losses of species richness by the end of the 21st century, with marked local differences in projections, both in terms of magnitude and trend, in some biodiversity hotspots. In both SDMs and hybrid approaches, nestedness with gains in species richness was the main pattern driving dissimilarity between present and future fish and macro-invertebrate species assemblages at the Mediterranean basin scale. However, at local scale, we highlighted some differences in the relative contribution of nestedness vs replacement in driving dissimilarity. Our results call for the development of integrated modelling tools that can mechanistically consider multiple biotic and abiotic drivers to improve projections of future marine biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 115 条
  • [41] Modelling the effects of climate change on the distribution and production of marine fishes: accounting for trophic interactions in a dynamic bioclimate envelope model
    Fernandes, Jose A.
    Cheung, William W. L.
    Jennings, Simon
    Butenschoen, Momme
    de Mora, Lee
    Froelicher, Thomas L.
    Barange, Manuel
    Grant, Alastair
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (08) : 2596 - 2607
  • [42] Ferrier S., 2016, METHODOLOGICAL ASSES, P348
  • [43] Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems
    Gallardo, Belinda
    Clavero, Miguel
    Sanchez, Marta I.
    Vila, Montserrat
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2016, 22 (01) : 151 - 163
  • [44] Accounting for biotic interactions through alpha-diversity constraints in stacked species distribution models
    Gavish, Yoni
    Marsh, Charles J.
    Kuemmerlen, Mathias
    Stoll, Stefan
    Haase, Peter
    Kunin, William E.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 8 (09): : 1092 - 1102
  • [45] Improving species distribution models using biotic interactions: a case study of parasites, pollinators and plants
    Giannini, Tereza Cristina
    Chapman, Daniel S.
    Saraiva, Antonio Mauro
    Alves-dos-Santos, Isabel
    Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2013, 36 (06) : 649 - 656
  • [46] A framework for community interactions under climate change
    Gilman, Sarah E.
    Urban, Mark C.
    Tewksbury, Joshua
    Gilchrist, George W.
    Holt, Robert D.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2010, 25 (06) : 325 - 331
  • [47] Climate change hot-spots
    Giorgi, F
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (08)
  • [48] Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models
    Guisan, A
    Thuiller, W
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 8 (09) : 993 - 1009
  • [49] Forecasting fine-scale changes in the food-web structure of coastal marine communities under climate change
    Hattab, Tarek
    Leprieur, Fabien
    Lasram, Frida Ben Rais
    Gravel, Dominique
    Le Loc'h, Francois
    Albouy, Camille
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2016, 39 (12) : 1227 - 1237
  • [50] Towards a better understanding of potential impacts of climate change on marine species distribution: a multiscale modelling approach
    Hattab, Tarek
    Albouy, Camille
    Lasram, Frida Ben Rais
    Somot, Samuel
    Le Loc'h, Francois
    Leprieur, Fabien
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2014, 23 (12): : 1417 - 1429