Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans

被引:133
作者
Srdjevic, Bojan [1 ]
Medeiros, Yvonilde Dantas Pinto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Dept Water Management, Fac Agr, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
[2] Univ Fed Bahia, Dept Environm Engn, Salvador, BA, Brazil
关键词
multi-criteria analysis; fuzzy extent method; analytic hierarchy process (AHP);
D O I
10.1007/s11269-007-9197-5
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
There are two mainstreams when using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). One is the standard applications of crisp distributive and ideal mode versions. The other is characterised by fuzzification of the AHP methodology and by attempts to better tackle inherently uncertain and imprecise decision processes with quantitative and qualitative data. The latter is characterised by different approaches to fuzzificating the decision problem; the way of conducting judgment and evaluating process; and finally, in synthesising the results and manipulating fuzzy numbers to devise priorities for the decision alternatives. This paper presents a fuzzy methodology for solving fully structured decision problems with criteria, sub-criteria and alternatives. It follows the logic of AHP in a simple and straightforward manner, efficiently aggregates criteria and sub-criteria into unique hierarchical level and applies a total integral method for comparing decision alternatives. The proposed methodology has been used for the assessment of water management plans in part of the Paraguacu River Basin in Brazil.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 894
页数:18
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, LECT NOTES ECON M, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5
[2]   A rational approach to handling fuzzy perceptions in route choice [J].
Arslan, T ;
Khisty, CJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 168 (02) :571-583
[3]   A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty [J].
Bender, MJ ;
Simonovic, SP .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) :35-44
[4]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
BOENDER, CGE ;
DEGRAAN, JG ;
LOOTSMA, FA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 29 (02) :133-143
[5]  
BUCKLEY JJ, 1985, FUZZY SET SYST, V15, P21, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(85)90013-2
[6]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[7]   Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function [J].
Cheng, CH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 96 (02) :343-350
[8]   Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison [J].
Deng, HP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 1999, 21 (03) :215-231
[9]  
Fatti L., 1989, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE, P122, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-6_8, 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-6_8, 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-6_8.]
[10]  
Hwang C. L., 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]