Characteristics of screen-detected cancers following concordant or discordant recalls at blinded double reading in biennial digital screening mammography

被引:4
作者
Coolen, Angela M. P. [1 ]
Lameijer, Joost R. C. [2 ]
Voogd, Adri C. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Louwman, Marieke W. J. [4 ]
Strobbe, Luc J. [6 ]
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G. [5 ]
Duijm, Lucien E. M. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Elisabeth Tweesteden Hosp, Dept Radiol, NL-5000 LC Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Catharina Hosp, Dept Radiol, Michelangelolaan 2, NL-5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Epidemiol, GROW, P Debyelaan 1, NL-6229 HA Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org IKNL, Dept Res, NL-3501 DB Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Div Med Oncol, Dept Internal Med,GROW, P Debyelaan 1, NL-6229 HA Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Surg, POB 9015, NL-6500 GS Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Radiol, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, NL-6532 SZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[8] Dutch Expert Ctr Screening, Wijchenseweg 101, NL-6538 SW Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Mass screening; Early detection of cancer; Breast neoplasms; Mammography; Follow-up studies; BREAST-CANCER; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; READER VARIABILITY; 3RD READER; TOMOSYNTHESIS; ARBITRATION; PROGRAM; SENSITIVITY; CATEGORIES;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-018-5586-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo analyse which mammographic and tumour characteristics led to concordant versus discordant recalls at blinded double reading to further optimise our breast cancer screening programme.MethodsWe included a consecutive series of 99,013 screening mammograms obtained between July 2013 and January 2015. All mammograms were double read in a blinded fashion. Discordant readings were routinely recalled without consensus or arbitration. During the 2-year follow-up, relevant data of the recalled women were collected. We compared mammographic characteristics, screening outcome and tumour characteristics between concordant and discordant recalls.ResultsThere were 2,543 concordant recalls (71.4%) and 997 discordant recalls (28.0%). The positive predictive value of a concordant recall was significantly higher (23.5% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.001). The proportion of BI-RADS 0 was significantly higher in the discordant recall group (75.7% vs. 56.3%, p < 0.001). Discordant recalls were more often an asymmetry or architectural distortion (21.8% vs. 13.2% and 9.3% vs. 6.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). There were no differences in the distribution of DCIS and invasive cancers and tumour characteristics were comparable for the two groups, except for a more favourable tumour grade in the discordant recall group (54.7% vs. 39.9% grade I tumours, p = 0.022).ConclusionsScreen-detected cancers detected by a discordant reading show a more favourable tumour grade than cancers diagnosed after a concordant recall. The higher proportion of asymmetries and architectural distortions in this group provide a possible target for improving screening programmes by additional training of screening radiologists and the implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis.Key Points center dot With blinded double reading of screening mammograms, screen-detected cancers detected by a discordant reading show a more favourable tumour grade than cancers diagnosed after a concordant recall.center dot The proportions of asymmetries and architectural distortions are higher in case of a discordant reading.center dot Possible improvement strategies could target additional training of screening radiologists and the implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 344
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review [J].
Azavedo, Edward ;
Zackrisson, Sophia ;
Mejare, Ingegerd ;
Arnlind, Marianne Heibert .
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 12
[2]   Comparison of Digital Screening Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in the Early Detection of Clinically Relevant Cancers: A Multicenter Study [J].
Bluekens, Adriana M. J. ;
Holland, Roland ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
Broeders, Mireille J. M. ;
den Heeten, Gerard J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (03) :707-714
[3]  
Caumo F, 2011, RADIOL MED, V116, P84, DOI 10.1007/s11547-010-0606-0
[4]   Reader variability in reporting breast imaging according to BI-RADS® assessment categories (the Florence experience) [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Houssami, N ;
Apruzzese, A ;
Bassetti, E ;
Brancato, B ;
Carozzia, F ;
Catarzi, S ;
Lamberini, MP ;
Marcelli, G ;
Pellizzoni, R ;
Pesce, B ;
Risso, G ;
Russo, F ;
Scorsolini, A .
BREAST, 2006, 15 (01) :44-51
[5]   The role of arbitration of discordant reports at double reading of screening mammograms [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Ambrogetti, D ;
Risso, G ;
Catarzi, S ;
Morrone, D ;
Mantellini, P ;
Del Turco, MR .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2005, 12 (03) :125-127
[6]   Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion [J].
Dibble, Elizabeth H. ;
Lourenco, Ana P. ;
Baird, Grayson L. ;
Ward, Robert C. ;
Maynard, A. Stanley ;
Mainiero, Martha B. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) :3-10
[7]   Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome [J].
Duijm, L. E. M. ;
Louwman, M. W. J. ;
Groenewoud, J. H. ;
van de Poll-Franse, L. V. ;
Fracheboud, J. ;
Coebergh, J. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 100 (06) :901-907
[8]   Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: Effects on a biennial screening programme outcome [J].
Duijm, Lucien E. M. ;
Groenewoud, Johanna H. ;
Fracheboud, Jacques ;
van Ineveld, B. Martin ;
Roumen, Rudi M. H. ;
de Koning, Harry J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (09) :1223-1228
[9]   Early Clinical Experience with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening Mammography [J].
Durand, Melissa A. ;
Haas, Brian M. ;
Yao, Xiaopan ;
Geisel, Jaime L. ;
Raghu, Madhavi ;
Hooley, Regina J. ;
Horvath, Laura J. ;
Philpotts, Liane E. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (01) :85-92
[10]   PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ELSTON, CW ;
ELLIS, IO .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) :403-410