Can energy supply-side and demand-side policies for energy saving and emission reduction be synergistic?--- A simulated study on China's coal capacity cut and carbon tax

被引:69
作者
Li, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Yao, Xilong [1 ]
机构
[1] Taiyuan Univ Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coal capacity cut; Carbon tax; CGE model; Synergy degree; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CGE MODEL; TRADING SCHEME; CO2; EMISSIONS; FUEL TAX; IMPACTS; CLIMATE; CONSUMPTION; INDUSTRY; TAXATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111232
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Existing literature mainly focuses on the combined effect of different policies on energy, economy and environment. However, most of them were based on the perspective of energy demand-side. In order to fill this gap, we study the effect of carbon tax and coal capacity cut from both the energy demand-side and energy supply-side using a dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. Different policy effects including single one and synergistic one are compared. Moreover, the synergy degrees of coal capacity cut and carbon tax in energy saving, emission reduction and economic growth are evaluated. The results show that both coal capacity cut and carbon tax are beneficial to energy conservation and carbon emission mitigation at the expense of a slight loss in economy. Mixed policy has better performance than single policy in carbon emission reduction and energy saving. Also, a more stringent policy is conducive to carbon emission mitigation and energy conservation. Additionally, there are significant synergistic effect of coal capacity cut and carbon tax from the perspectives of energy saving, emission reduction and economic growth. Therefore, the mixed policy of coal capacity cut and carbon tax should be promoted and an appropriate stringency level of policy mix should be adopted.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
[21]   Exploring impact of carbon tax on China's CO2 reductions and provincial disparities [J].
Dong, Huijuan ;
Dai, Hancheng ;
Geng, Yong ;
Fujita, Tsuyoshi ;
Liu, Zhe ;
Xie, Yang ;
Wu, Rui ;
Fujii, Minoru ;
Masui, Toshihiko ;
Tang, Liang .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 77 :596-603
[22]   Energy demand and energy-related CO2 emissions in Greek manufacturing:: Assessing the impact of a carbon tax [J].
Floros, N ;
Vlachou, A .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (03) :387-413
[23]   Assessing the impact of a carbon tax in Ukraine [J].
Frey, Miriam .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2017, 17 (03) :378-396
[24]   The impact of aviation fuel tax on fuel consumption and carbon emissions: The case of the US airline industry [J].
Fukui, Hideki ;
Miyoshi, Chikage .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 50 :234-253
[25]  
Garella PG., 2018, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V6, P1
[26]   Impacts of carbon pricing on income inequality in Brazil [J].
Grottera, Carolina ;
Pereira, Amaro Olimpio ;
La Rovere, Emilio Lebre .
CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 9 (01) :80-93
[27]   The impact of carbon tax policy on energy consumption and CO2 emission in China [J].
Guo, Z. Q. ;
Liu, H. B. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2016, 11 (08) :725-731
[28]   Exploring the impacts of a carbon tax on the Chinese economy using a CGE model with a detailed disaggregation of energy sectors [J].
Guo, Zhengquan ;
Zhang, Xingping ;
Zheng, Yuhua ;
Rao, Rao .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 45 :455-462
[29]   Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we learned? [J].
Haites, Erik .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2018, 18 (08) :955-966
[30]   Analysis of carbon tax efficiency in energy industries of selected EU countries [J].
Hajek, Miroslav ;
Zimmermannova, Jarmila ;
Heiman, Karel ;
Rozensky, Ladislav .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 134