It's fair for us: Diversity structures cause women to legitimize discrimination

被引:51
作者
Brady, Laura M. [1 ]
Kaiser, Cheryl R. [1 ]
Major, Brenda [2 ]
Kirby, Teri A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Psychol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Sexism; Diversity; Discrimination; Legitimacy; Procedural justice; Benevolent sexism; SYSTEM-JUSTIFYING BELIEFS; BENEVOLENT SEXISM; AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION; GENDER SYSTEM; PREJUDICE; HOSTILE; EXPECTATIONS; PERCEPTIONS; STEREOTYPES; CUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2014.11.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Three experiments tested the hypothesis that the mere presence (vs. absence) of diversity structures makes it more difficult for women to detect sexism. In Experiment 1, even when a company's hiring decisions disadvantaged women, women perceived the company as more procedurally just for women and were less supportive of sexism litigation when the company offered diversity training, compared to when it did not. In Experiment 2, women perceived a company as more procedurally just for women and as less likely to have engaged in sexism when the company offered diversity training, compared to when it did not. This effect was not moderated by women's endorsement of status legitimizing beliefs. In Experiment 3, women perceived a company as more procedurally just and less discriminatory when the company had been recognized for positive gender diversity practices compared to when it had not. Additionally, these effects were most pronounced among women who endorsed benevolent sexist beliefs and mitigated among those who rejected benevolent sexist beliefs. Together, these experiments demonstrate that diversity structures can make it difficult for women to detect and remedy discrimination, especially women who hold benevolent sexist beliefs. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 110
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Latinas and African Americans at Work
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SPSS SAS MPLUS MACRO
[3]   Yet Another Dark Side of Chivalry: Benevolent Sexism Undermines and Hostile Sexism Motivates Collective Action for Social Change [J].
Becker, Julia C. ;
Wright, Stephen C. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (01) :62-77
[4]   The mentor's dilemma: Providing critical feedback across the racial divide [J].
Cohen, GL ;
Steele, CM ;
Ross, LD .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1999, 25 (10) :1302-1318
[5]   On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure [J].
Colquitt, JA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) :386-400
[6]   SOCIAL STIGMA AND SELF-ESTEEM - THE SELF-PROTECTIVE PROPERTIES OF STIGMA [J].
CROCKER, J ;
MAJOR, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 96 (04) :608-630
[7]  
Dasgupta N., 2004, SOC JUSTICE RES, V17, P143, DOI [DOI 10.1023/B:SORE.0000027407.70241.15, 10.1023/b:sore.0000027407.70241.15]
[8]  
Dobbin F, 2009, INV EQ OPP, P321
[9]   Diversity initiatives, status, and system-justifying beliefs: When and how diversity efforts de-legitimize discrimination claims [J].
Dover, Tessa L. ;
Major, Brenda ;
Kaiser, Cheryl R. .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2014, 17 (04) :485-493
[10]  
Eagly A.H., 1987, JOHN M MACEACHRAN ME, DOI [10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1010, DOI 10.4324/]