Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability, Time in Therapeutic Range, and Risk of De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies

被引:50
|
作者
Davis, Scott [1 ]
Gralla, Jane [2 ]
Klem, Patrick [3 ]
Stites, Erik [1 ]
Wiseman, Alexander [1 ]
Cooper, James E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Div Renal Dis & Hypertens, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Pediat, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Pharm, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
MEDIATED REJECTION; BLOOD-LEVELS; KIDNEY; HLA;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0000000000002913
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Tacrolimus (TAC) is the most important agent for maintenance immunosuppression and prevention of immunologic injury to the renal allograft, yet there remains no consensus on how best to monitor drug therapy. Both high TAC intrapatient variability and low TAC time in therapeutic range (TTR) have been associated with risk of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA). In this study, we hypothesized that the risk associated with high TAC coefficient of variation (CV) is a result of low TAC TTR rather than the variability itself. Methods. We analyzed the risk of dnDSA, acute rejection, or death-censored graft loss by non-dosed-corrected TAC CV and TAC TTR during the first posttransplant year in a cohort of 538 patients with a median follow-up period of 4.1 years. Results. Patients with CV >44.2% and TTR <40% (high intrapatient variability and low TTR) had a high risk of dnDSA (adjusted OR = 4.93, 95% confidence interval = 2.02-12.06, P < 0.001) and death-censored graft loss by 5 years (adjusted HR = 4.00, 95% confidence interval = 1.31-12.24, P = 0.015) when compared with patients with CV >44.2% and TTR >= 40% (high intrapatient variability and optimal TTR), while the latter patients had similar risk to patients with CV <44.2% (lower intrapatient variability). Conclusions. These data suggest that previously reported immunologic risk associated with high TAC intrapatient variability is due to time outside of therapeutic range rather than variability in and of itself when evaluating absolute non-dose-corrected TAC levels irrespective of reason or indication.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 887
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lower tacrolimus exposure and time in therapeutic range increase the risk of de novo donor-specific antibodies in the first year of kidney transplantation
    Davis, Scott
    Gralla, Jane
    Klem, Patrick
    Tong, Suhong
    Wedermyer, Gina
    Freed, Brian
    Wiseman, Alexander
    Cooper, James E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 (04) : 907 - 915
  • [2] Tacrolimus's Time Below Therapeutic Range Is Associated With Acute Pancreatic Graft Rejection and the Development of De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies
    Rodriguez-Espinosa, Diana
    Broseta, Jose Jesus
    Montagud-Marrahi, Enrique
    Arana, Carolt
    Ferrer, Joana
    Cuatrecasas, Miriam
    Garcia-Criado, Angeles
    Amor, Antonio J.
    Diekmann, Fritz
    Ventura-Aguiar, Pedro
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 37
  • [3] Tacrolimus variability is associated with de novo donor-specific antibody development in pediatric renal transplant recipients
    Solomon, Sonia
    Colovai, Adriana
    Del Rio, Marcela
    Hayde, Nicole
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 35 (02) : 261 - 270
  • [4] Tacrolimus variability is associated with de novo donor-specific antibody development in pediatric renal transplant recipients
    Sonia Solomon
    Adriana Colovai
    Marcela Del Rio
    Nicole Hayde
    Pediatric Nephrology, 2020, 35 : 261 - 270
  • [5] Impact of low tacrolimus exposure and high tacrolimus intra-patient variability on the development of de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies in kidney transplant recipients
    Rojas, Aleixandra Mendoza
    Hesselink, Dennis A.
    van Besouw, Nicole M.
    Baan, Carla C.
    van Gelder, Teun
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 15 (12) : 1323 - 1331
  • [6] De novo DQ donor-specific antibodies are associated with worse outcomes compared to non-DQ de novo donor-specific antibodies following heart transplantation
    Cole, Robert Townsend
    Gandhi, Jonathan
    Bray, Robert A.
    Gebel, Howard M.
    Morris, Alanna
    McCue, Andrew
    Yin, Michael
    Laskar, S. Raja
    Book, Wendy
    Jokhadar, Maan
    Smith, Andrew
    Duc Nguyen
    Vega, J. David
    Gupta, Divya
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 31 (04)
  • [7] Utility of Protocol Pancreas Biopsies for De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies
    Parajuli, Sandesh
    Mandelbrot, Didier
    Odorico, Jon
    TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT, 2022, 8 (03):
  • [8] De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies: Biomarkers of Pancreas Transplant Failure
    Mittal, S.
    Page, S. L.
    Friend, P. J.
    Sharples, E. J.
    Fuggle, S. V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 (07) : 1664 - 1671
  • [9] Early clearance vs persistence of de novo donor-specific antibodies following lung transplantation
    Islam, Ana K.
    Sinha, Neeraj
    DeVos, Jennifer M.
    Kaleekal, Thomas S.
    Jyothula, Soma S.
    Teeter, Larry D.
    Nguyen, Duc T. M.
    Eagar, Todd N.
    Moore, Linda W.
    Puppala, Mamta
    Wong, Stephen T. C.
    Knight, Richard J.
    Frost, Adaani E.
    Graviss, Edward A.
    Gaber, A. Osama
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 31 (08)
  • [10] A rational approach to guide cost-effective de novo donor-specific antibody surveillance with tacrolimus immunosuppression
    Wiebe, Chris
    Balshaw, Rob
    Gibson, Ian W.
    Ho, Julie
    Shaw, Jamie
    Karpinski, Martin
    Trachtenberg, Aaron
    Pochinco, Denise
    Goldberg, Aviva
    Birk, Patricia
    Pinsk, Maury
    Rush, David N.
    Nickerson, Peter W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (12) : 1882 - 1892