Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries

被引:39
作者
Scaioli, Giacomo [1 ]
Schafer, Willemijn L. A. [2 ]
Boerma, Wienke G. W. [3 ]
Spreeuwenberg, Peter M. M. [3 ]
Schellevis, Francois G. [3 ,4 ]
Groenewegen, Peter P. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Piazza Polonia 94, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Surg, 633 N St Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] NIVEL Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, POB 1568, NL-3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Boechorststr 7, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Utrecht, Dept Sociol, POB 80-115, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht, Dept Human Geog, POB 80-115, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Continuity of care; Communication; Primary care; Secondary care; Referrals; PRIMARY-CARE; HEALTH-CARE; COORDINATION; CONTINUITY; PHYSICIANS; SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCES; IMPACT; WORK;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-020-01124-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The communication of relevant patient information between general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists is important in order to avoid fragmentation of care thus achieving a higher quality of care and ensuring physicians' and patients' satisfaction. However, this communication is often not carried out properly. The objective of this study is to assess whether communication between GPs and medical specialists in the referral process is associated with the organisation of primary care within a country, the characteristics of the GPs, and the characteristics of the primary care practices themselves. Methods An analysis of a cross-sectional survey among GPs in 34 countries was conducted. The odds ratios of the features that were expected to relate to higher rates of referral letters sent and communications fed back to GPs were calculated using ordered logistic multilevel models. Results A total of 7183 GPs from 34 countries were surveyed. Variations between countries in referral letters sent and feedback communication received did occur. Little of the variance between countries could be explained. GPs stated that they send more referral letters, and receive more feedback communications from medical specialists, in countries where they act as gatekeepers, and when, in general, they interact more with specialists. GPs reported higher use of referral letters when they had a secretary and/or a nurse in their practice, used health information technologies, and had greater job satisfaction. Conclusions There are large differences in communication between GPs and medical specialists. These differences can partly be explained by characteristics of the country, the GP and the primary care practice. Further studies should also take the organisation of secondary care into account.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Participation in medical activities beyond standard consultations by Swiss general practitioners: a cross-sectional study [J].
Jakob, Julian ;
Cohidon, Christine ;
Cornuz, Jacques ;
Selby, Kevin .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19
[42]   Participation in medical activities beyond standard consultations by Swiss general practitioners: a cross-sectional study [J].
Julian Jakob ;
Christine Cohidon ;
Jacques Cornuz ;
Kevin Selby .
BMC Family Practice, 19
[43]   Assessing the potential for improvement of primary care in 34 countries: a cross-sectional survey [J].
Schaefer, Willemijn L. A. ;
Boerma, Wienke G. W. ;
Murante, Anna M. ;
Sixma, Herman J. M. ;
Schellevis, Francois G. ;
Groenewegena, Peter P. .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2015, 93 (03) :161-168
[44]   Barriers and enablers to referral of older adults to hearing care: a cross-sectional questionnaire study of Australian general practitioners [J].
Davine, Ella C. ;
Busby, Peter A. ;
Peters, Sanne ;
Francis, Jill J. ;
Harris, David ;
Timmer, Barbra H. B. ;
Sarant, Julia Z. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2025, 31 (03)
[45]   Assessing the quality of referral letters written by general practitioners: a cross-sectional study in rural Iran [J].
Janati, Ali ;
Amini, Abolgasem ;
Adham, Davoud ;
Naseriasl, Mansour .
CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2017, 33 (02)
[46]   How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey [J].
Annette J Berendsen ;
Annegriet Kuiken ;
Wim HGM Benneker ;
Betty Meyboom-de Jong ;
Theo B Voorn ;
Jan Schuling .
BMC Health Services Research, 9
[47]   Related factors of turnover intention among general practitioners: a cross-sectional study in 6 provinces of China [J].
Sun, Yanchun ;
Wang, Wei ;
Yan, Fei ;
Xie, Xueqin ;
Cai, Min ;
Xu, Fang ;
Qian, Yi ;
Xiao, Yuanyuan ;
Xu, Chuanzhi ;
Zhao, Wenlan .
BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2025, 26 (01)
[48]   How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey [J].
Berendsen, Annette J. ;
Kuiken, Annegriet ;
Benneker, Wim H. G. M. ;
Meyboom-de Jong, Betty ;
Voorn, Theo B. ;
Schuling, Jan .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 9
[49]   Practice nurse support and task suitability in a general practice: a cross-sectional survey in Belgium [J].
Matthys, Evi ;
Remmen, Roy ;
Van Bogaert, Peter .
JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2019, 33 (06) :661-669
[50]   General Practitioners' Perspectives on Barriers to Communication With Specialists in the Referral System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis [J].
Fattahi, Hamed ;
Seproo, Faezeh Ghasemi ;
Fattahi, Arash ;
Rostami, Vahideh ;
Shokri, Azad .
HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2025, 8 (05)