Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries

被引:34
作者
Scaioli, Giacomo [1 ]
Schafer, Willemijn L. A. [2 ]
Boerma, Wienke G. W. [3 ]
Spreeuwenberg, Peter M. M. [3 ]
Schellevis, Francois G. [3 ,4 ]
Groenewegen, Peter P. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Piazza Polonia 94, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Surg, 633 N St Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] NIVEL Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, POB 1568, NL-3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Boechorststr 7, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Utrecht, Dept Sociol, POB 80-115, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht, Dept Human Geog, POB 80-115, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Continuity of care; Communication; Primary care; Secondary care; Referrals; PRIMARY-CARE; HEALTH-CARE; COORDINATION; CONTINUITY; PHYSICIANS; SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCES; IMPACT; WORK;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-020-01124-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The communication of relevant patient information between general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists is important in order to avoid fragmentation of care thus achieving a higher quality of care and ensuring physicians' and patients' satisfaction. However, this communication is often not carried out properly. The objective of this study is to assess whether communication between GPs and medical specialists in the referral process is associated with the organisation of primary care within a country, the characteristics of the GPs, and the characteristics of the primary care practices themselves. Methods An analysis of a cross-sectional survey among GPs in 34 countries was conducted. The odds ratios of the features that were expected to relate to higher rates of referral letters sent and communications fed back to GPs were calculated using ordered logistic multilevel models. Results A total of 7183 GPs from 34 countries were surveyed. Variations between countries in referral letters sent and feedback communication received did occur. Little of the variance between countries could be explained. GPs stated that they send more referral letters, and receive more feedback communications from medical specialists, in countries where they act as gatekeepers, and when, in general, they interact more with specialists. GPs reported higher use of referral letters when they had a secretary and/or a nurse in their practice, used health information technologies, and had greater job satisfaction. Conclusions There are large differences in communication between GPs and medical specialists. These differences can partly be explained by characteristics of the country, the GP and the primary care practice. Further studies should also take the organisation of secondary care into account.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A quality assurance survey to improve communication between ENT specialists and general practitioners
    Thong, J. F.
    Mok, P.
    Loke, D.
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 51 (10) : 796 - 799
  • [22] The association between the workload of general practitioners and patient experiences with care: results of a cross-sectional study in 33 countries
    Schafer, Willemijn L. A.
    van den Berg, Michael J.
    Groenewegen, Peter P.
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [23] Career after successful medical board examination in general practice - a cross-sectional survey
    Tandjung, Ryan
    Senn, Oliver
    Marty, Franz
    Krauss, Linda
    Rosemann, Thomas
    Badertscher, Nina
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2013, 143
  • [24] Perceptions of general practitioners towards the services provided by advanced practice nurses: a cross-sectional survey in France
    Goddaert, Charles
    Gerard, Pierre-Antoine
    Kessler, Charlotte
    Leblanc, Melaine
    Barbe, Coralie
    Chrusciel, Jan
    Cormi, Clement
    Sanchez, Stephane
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [25] General practitioners' assessment of interventions applied to optimize laboratory test utilization: a cross-sectional survey study
    Lillo, Serena
    Larsen, Trine Rennebod
    Kyvik, Kirsten Ohm
    Sondergaard, Jens
    Antonsen, Steen
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2023, 83 (06) : 417 - 423
  • [26] Internet use for information seeking in clinical practice: A cross-sectional survey among French general practitioners
    Bernard, Erik
    Arnould, Michel
    Saint-Lary, Olivier
    Duhot, Didier
    Hebbrecht, Gilles
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2012, 81 (07) : 493 - 499
  • [27] China's national continuing medical education program for general practitioners: a cross-sectional survey (2016-2023)
    You, Conglei
    Wang, Lingling
    Zhang, Jian
    Yao, Mi
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [28] Acceptance of Telerheumatology by Rheumatologists and General Practitioners in Germany: Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey Study
    Muehlensiepen, Felix
    Knitza, Johannes
    Marquardt, Wenke
    Engler, Jennifer
    Hueber, Axel
    Welcker, Martin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (03)
  • [29] General practitioners' well-being in Belgium: results from the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study
    Cholewa, Joanna
    Ponsar, Cecile
    de Rouffignac, Segolene
    Petre, Benoit
    Van Poel, Esther
    Willems, Sara
    De Jonghe, Michel
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 24 (SUPPL 1):
  • [30] General Practitioners Recognizing Alcohol Dependence: A Large Cross-Sectional Study in 6 European Countries
    Rehm, Juergen
    Allamani, Allaman
    Della Vedova, Roberto
    Elekes, Zsuzsanna
    Jakubczyk, Andrzej
    Landsmane, Inga
    Manthey, Jakob
    Moreno-Espana, Jose
    Pieper, Lars
    Probst, Charlotte
    Snikere, Sigita
    Struzzo, Pierluigi
    Voller, Fabio
    Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich
    Gual, Antoni
    Wojnar, Marcin
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 13 (01) : 28 - 32