Trends and Opportunities for Bridging Prevention Science and US Federal Policy

被引:3
作者
Scott, J. Taylor [1 ]
Prendergast, Sarah [2 ]
Demeusy, Elizabeth [3 ]
McGuire, Kristina [4 ]
Crowley, Max [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Urban Inst, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[3] Medstar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Washington, DC USA
[4] Dept Juvenile Justice, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
Evidence-based policy; Juvenile justice; Research use; Legislation; Delinquency; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s11121-022-01403-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Prevention science sheds light on complex social policy problems, yet its social impact cannot reach full potential without the uptake of research evidence by policymakers. This mixed-methods study examined the US federal legislation pertaining to justice-involved youth to reveal opportunities for strengthening the use of prevention science in legislation. The results indicated that research language, particularly references to the type of study (e.g., longitudinal) or methodology (e.g., data mining), within bills predicted bill progression out of committee and enactment. Rigorous scientific methods may either lend credence to a bill during its progression in the legislative process or may be infused in language during mark-up and negotiation of bills that successfully progress in Congress. In-depth bill coding illustrated the ways that research has been used in legislation to define problems, reinforce effective practice, generate knowledge through research and evaluation, and disseminate findings. A prominent implication of these findings is that policies could be used to improve data monitoring and evaluation capacity in ways that enhance the implementation of evidence-based interventions. The comprehensive use of research in legislation increases the likelihood that policies reach their intended outcomes and benefit those they are designed to serve.
引用
收藏
页码:1333 / 1342
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Children's judgments of disloyal and immoral peer behavior: Subjective group dynamics in minimal intergroup contexts
    Abrams, Dominic
    Rutland, Adam
    Ferrell, Jennifer M.
    Pelletier, Joseph
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 79 (02) : 444 - 461
  • [2] Arredondo D.E., 2003, Stanford Law Policy Reviews, V14, P13
  • [3] Boaz Annette., 2019, What Works Now? Evidence Informed Policy and Practice
  • [4] Bogenschneider K., 2021, Evidence-based Policymaking: Envisioning a New Era of Theory, Research and Practice, V2nd
  • [5] The Impact of Reentry Services on Juvenile Offenders' Recidivism
    Bouffard, Jeffrey A.
    Bergseth, Kathleen J.
    [J]. YOUTH VIOLENCE AND JUVENILE JUSTICE, 2008, 6 (03) : 295 - 318
  • [6] The Legislative Influence Detector: Finding Text Reuse in State Legislation
    Burgess, Matthew
    Giraudy, Eugenia
    Katz-Samuels, Julian
    Walsh, Joe
    Willis, Derek
    Haynes, Lauren
    Ghani, Rayid
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 57 - 65
  • [7] Reviving juvenile justice in a get-tough era
    Butts, JA
    Mears, DP
    [J]. YOUTH & SOCIETY, 2001, 33 (02) : 169 - 198
  • [8] Commission of Evidence-Based Policymaking, 2017, PROMISE EVIDENCE BAS
  • [9] Council N.R., 2013, REFORMING JUVENILE J
  • [10] Council of State Governments Justice Center, 2013, REENT MATT STRAT SUC