The threshold detectable mass diameter for 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis

被引:21
作者
Hadjipanteli, Andria [1 ,2 ]
Elangovan, Premkumar [1 ]
Mackenzie, Alistair [1 ]
Wells, Kevin [3 ]
Dance, David R. [1 ,4 ]
Young, Kenneth C. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, Natl Coordinating Ctr Phys Mammog, Guildford, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Cyprus, Med Sch, Nicosia, Cyprus
[3] Univ Surrey, Ctr Vis Speech & Signal Proc, Guildford, Surrey, England
[4] Univ Surrey, Dept Phys, Guildford, Surrey, England
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2019年 / 57卷
关键词
2D-mammography; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Masses; SYNTHETIC MAMMOGRAPHY; ACQUISITION GEOMETRY; SYSTEM GEOMETRY; PERFORMANCE; OBSERVER; PHANTOM; IMAGES; NOISE; UK; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.11.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is currently under consideration for replacement of, or combined use with 2D-mammography in national breast screening programmes. To investigate the potential benefits that DBT can bring to screening, the threshold detectable lesion diameters were measured for different forms of DBT in comparison to 2D-mammography. The aim of this study was to compare the threshold detectable mass diameters obtained with narrow angle (15 degrees/15 projections) and wide angle (50 degrees/25 projections) DBT in comparison to 2D-mammography. Simulated images of 60 mm thick compressed breasts were produced with and without masses using a set of validated image modelling tools for 2D-mammography and DBT. Image processing and reconstruction were performed using commercial software. A series of 4-alternative forced choice (4AFC) experiments was conducted for signal detection with the masses as targets. The threshold detectable mass diameter was found for each imaging modality with a mean glandular dose of 2.5 mGy. The resulting values of the threshold diameter for 2D-mammography (10.2 +/- 1.4 mm) were found to be larger (p < 0.001) than those for narrow angle DBT (6.0 +/- 1.1 mm) and wide angle DBT (5.6 +/- 1.2 mm). There was no significant difference between the threshold diameters for wide and narrow angle DBT. Implications for the introduction of DBT alone or in combination with 2D-mammography in breast cancer screening are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 32
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Synthesized Mammography: The New Standard of Care When Screening for Breast Cancer with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?
    Ambinder, Emily B.
    Harvey, Susan C.
    Panigrahi, Babita
    Li, Ximin
    Woods, Ryan W.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (08) : 973 - 976
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, 89 IPEM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis," EUREF, V4th
  • [4] Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data
    Bouwman, R. W.
    van Engen, R. E.
    Young, K. C.
    den Heeten, G. J.
    Broeders, M. J. M.
    Schopphoven, S.
    Jeukens, C. R. L. P. N.
    Veldkamp, W. J. H.
    Dance, D. R.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (20) : 7893 - 7907
  • [5] IMAGE QUALITY, THE IDEAL OBSERVER, AND HUMAN-PERFORMANCE OF RADIOLOGIC DECISION TASKS
    BURGESS, A
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1995, 2 (06) : 522 - 526
  • [6] The Rose model, revisited
    Burgess, AE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1999, 16 (03): : 633 - 646
  • [7] Design and application of a structured phantom for detection performance comparison between breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography
    Cockmartin, L.
    Marshall, N. W.
    Zhang, G.
    Lemmens, K.
    Shaheen, E.
    Van Ongeval, C.
    Fredenberg, E.
    Dance, D. R.
    Salvagnini, E.
    Michielsen, K.
    Bosmans, H.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (03) : 758 - 780
  • [8] Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols
    Dance, D. R.
    Young, K. C.
    van Engen, R. E.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (02) : 453 - 471
  • [9] Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol
    Dance, DR
    Skinner, CL
    Young, KC
    Beckett, JR
    Kotre, CJ
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (11) : 3225 - 3240
  • [10] Tomosynthesis imaging: At a translational crossroads
    Dobbins, James T., III
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) : 1956 - 1967