Numeracy, literacy and earnings: evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth

被引:50
作者
Dougherty, C
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Econ, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Ctr Econ Performance, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
salary wage differentials;
D O I
10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00040-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The analysis is concerned with the contributions of numeracy and literacy to earnings, for three reasons. First, no clear pattern emerges from existing findings relating to the contributions of different types of ability, and numeracy and literacy appear to be a natural basic starting point. Second, measures to improve numeracy and literacy are often given priority in policies intended to help those with lowest educational attainment. Third, with the growth of the knowledge-based economy, and the increasing importance of digital technology, it is of interest to compare the levels and rates of change of the contributions of numeracy and literacy as reflected in earnings. The results suggest that numeracy has a highly significant effect on earnings, mostly through its effect on college attainment, but also directly, controlling for attainment, and interactively with attainment, and its effect may be subject to increasing returns. While the magnitude of the effect is small in absolute terms, it is substantial when compared with other effects, and it appears to be increasing at a rate of 6% per year. Despite the fact that it has an even greater effect than numeracy on college attainment, literacy has a smaller and less significant effect on earnings, with no evidence of an interactive effect with attainment, nonlinearity, or change through time. Because of the absence of nonlinearity, measures to improve literacy may have more impact than measures to improve numeracy on the earnings of the least able, but the difference is not great and the quantitative effects appear to be small. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 521
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INHANDBOOK LABOUR EC
[2]   What do educational credentials signal and why do employers value credentials? [J].
Arkes, J .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 1999, 18 (01) :133-141
[3]  
BISHOP J, 1992, CARNEGIE-ROCHESTER C, V37, P127, DOI DOI 10.1016/0167-2231(92)90006-5
[4]  
BLACKBURN M, 1990, FUTURE LOUSY JOBS
[5]   ARE OLS ESTIMATES OF THE RETURN TO SCHOOLING BIASED DOWNWARD - ANOTHER LOOK [J].
BLACKBURN, ML ;
NEUMARK, D .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1995, 77 (02) :217-230
[6]   OMITTED-ABILITY BIAS AND THE INCREASE IN THE RETURN TO SCHOOLING [J].
BLACKBURN, ML ;
NEUMARK, D .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 1993, 11 (03) :521-544
[7]  
BOCK RD, 1986, ADV DISADVANTAGE PRO
[8]   HOW MUCH DOES SCHOOLING INFLUENCE GENERAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS COGNITIVE COMPONENTS - A REASSESSMENT OF THE EVIDENCE [J].
CECI, SJ .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 27 (05) :703-722
[9]  
CHAMBERLAIN G, 1977, J ECONOMETRICS, V5, P241
[10]  
*CTR HUM RES RES, 1990, NLSY DOC 1979 1988 B