Earthquake Early Warning System for Structural Drift Prediction Using Machine Learning and Linear Regressors

被引:14
作者
Iaccarino, Antonio Giovanni [1 ]
Gueguen, Philippe [2 ]
Picozzi, Matteo [1 ]
Ghimire, Subash [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Napoli Federico II, Dipartimento Fis Ettore Pancini, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Gustave Eiffel, Univ Savoie Mt Blanc, Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS,ISTerre,IRD, Grenoble, France
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
earthquake early warning; onsite EEW; structural drift; machine learning regressors; building monitoring; BUILDINGS; INTENSITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.3389/feart.2021.666444
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In this work, we explored the feasibility of predicting the structural drift from the first seconds of P-wave signals for On-site Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) applications. To this purpose, we investigated the performance of both linear least square regression (LSR) and four non-linear machine learning (ML) models: Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machines and K-Nearest Neighbors. Furthermore, we also explore the applicability of the models calibrated for a region to another one. The LSR and ML models are calibrated and validated using a dataset of similar to 6,000 waveforms recorded within 34 Japanese structures with three different type of construction (steel, reinforced concrete, and steel-reinforced concrete), and a smaller one of data recorded at US buildings (69 buildings, 240 waveforms). As EEW information, we considered three P-wave parameters (the peak displacement, Pd, the integral of squared velocity, IV2, and displacement, ID2) using three time-windows (i.e., 1, 2, and 3 s), for a total of nine features to predict the drift ratio as structural response. The Japanese dataset is used to calibrate the LSR and ML models and to study their capability to predict the structural drift. We explored different subsets of the Japanese dataset (i.e., one building, one single type of construction, the entire dataset. We found that the variability of both ground motion and buildings response can affect the drift predictions robustness. In particular, the predictions accuracy worsens with the complexity of the dataset in terms of building and event variability. Our results show that ML techniques perform always better than LSR models, likely due to the complex connections between features and the natural non-linearity of the data. Furthermore, we show that by implementing a residuals analysis, the main sources of drift variability can be identified. Finally, the models trained on the Japanese dataset are applied the US dataset. In our application, we found that the exporting EEW models worsen the prediction variability, but also that by including correction terms as function of the magnitude can strongly mitigate such problem. In other words, our results show that the drift for US buildings can be predicted by minor tweaks to models.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   The Variability of Ground-Motion Prediction Models and Its Components [J].
Al Atik, Linda ;
Abrahamson, Norman ;
Bommer, Julian J. ;
Scherbaum, Frank ;
Cotton, Fabrice ;
Kuehn, Nicolas .
SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 81 (05) :794-801
[2]   AN INTRODUCTION TO KERNEL AND NEAREST-NEIGHBOR NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION [J].
ALTMAN, NS .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1992, 46 (03) :175-185
[3]   NDE1.0: a new database of earthquake data recordings from buildings for engineering applications [J].
Astorga, Ariana ;
Gueguen, Philippe ;
Ghimire, Subash ;
Kashima, Toshihide .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (04) :1321-1344
[4]   Nonlinear Elasticity Observed in Buildings during a Long Sequence of Earthquakes [J].
Astorga, Ariana ;
Gueguen, Philippe ;
Kashima, Toshihide .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 108 (3A) :1185-1198
[5]   Recovery of the resonance frequency of buildings following strong seismic deformation as a proxy for structural health [J].
Astorga, Ariana Lucia ;
Gueguen, Philippe ;
Riviere, Jacques ;
Kashima, Toshihide ;
Johnson, Paul Allan .
STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 18 (5-6) :1966-1981
[6]  
Breiman L., 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5
[7]   Predicting the macroseismic intensity from early radiated P wave energy for on-site earthquake early warning in Italy [J].
Brondi, P. ;
Picozzi, M. ;
Emolo, A. ;
Zollo, A. ;
Mucciarelli, M. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2015, 120 (10) :7174-7189
[8]   An on-site alert level early warning system for Italy [J].
Caruso, A. ;
Colombelli, S. ;
Elia, L. ;
Picozzi, M. ;
Zollo, A. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2017, 122 (03) :2106-2118
[9]   A smart mechatronic base isolation system using earthquake early warning [J].
Chan, Ricky W. K. ;
Lin, Yan-Shing ;
Tagawa, Hiroshi .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 119 :299-307
[10]   ShakeAlert Earthquake Early Warning System Performance during the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence [J].
Chung, Angela, I ;
Meier, Men-Andrin ;
Andrews, Jennifer ;
Bose, Maren ;
Crowell, Brendan W. ;
McGuire, Jeffrey J. ;
Smith, Deborah E. .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 110 (04) :1904-1923