Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the diffusion parameter EStImation with Gibbs and NoisE removal pipeline

被引:115
作者
Ades-Aron, Benjamin [1 ]
Veraart, Jelle [1 ]
Kochunov, Peter [2 ]
McGuire, Stephen [3 ]
Sherman, Paul [3 ]
Kellner, Elias [4 ]
Novikov, Dmitry S. [1 ]
Fieremans, Els [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Ctr Biomed Imaging, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] US Air Force, Sch Aerosp Med, Aeromed Res Dept, 2510 5th St,Bldg 840, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
[4] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Freiburg, Germany
基金
比利时弗兰德研究基金会;
关键词
Diffusion MRI; Denoising; Gibbs ringing; Image processing; Artifact correction; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; DATA EXTRAPOLATION METHOD; WATER DIFFUSION; WEIGHTED MRI; IMAGES; MODEL; ARTIFACTS; QUANTIFICATION; DISTORTIONS; MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.066
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This work evaluates the accuracy and precision of the Diffusion parameter EStImation with Gibbs and NoisE Removal (DESIGNER) pipeline, developed to identify and minimize common sources of methodological variability including: thermal noise, Gibbs ringing artifacts, Rician bias, EPI and eddy current induced spatial distortions, and motion-related artifacts. Following this processing pipeline, iterative parameter estimation techniques were used to derive diffusion parameters of interest based on the diffusion tensor and kurtosis tensor. We evaluated accuracy using a software phantom based on 36 diffusion datasets from the Human Connectome project and tested the precision by analyzing data from 30 healthy volunteers scanned three times within one week. Preprocessing with both DESIGNER or a standard pipeline based on smoothing (instead of noise removal) improved parameter precision by up to a factor of 2 compared to preprocessing with motion correction alone. When evaluating accuracy, we report average decreases in bias (deviation from simulated parameters) over all included regions for fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, mean kurtosis, and axonal water fraction of 9.7%, 8.7%, 4.2%, and 7.6% using DESIGNER compared to the standard pipeline, demonstrating that preprocessing with DESIGNER improves accuracy compared to other processing methods.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 543
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条