Pharmacokinetic parameters analyzed from MR contrast enhancement kinetics of multiple malignant and benign breast lesions detected in the same patients

被引:15
作者
Su, MY
Yu, HJ
Carpenter, PM
McLaren, CE
Nalcioglu, O
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, John Tu & Thomas Yuen Ctr Funct OncoImaging, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Pathol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Med Epidemiol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
contrast enhancement kinetics; differential diagnosis; multiple breast lesions; pharmacokinetic model; and preoperative MRI;
D O I
10.1177/153303460500400305
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Ninety-nine patients with confirmed breast cancer were reviewed to identify patients who had two confirmed malignant lesions of identical pathology (Group-1, N=17), and patients who had one malignant lesion and the second benign lesion (Group-2, N=8). Contrast enhancement kinetics from every lesion was measured and analyzed using three different models to obtain fitting parameters related to up-slope, enhancement amplitude, and washout, including Model-1: modified Tofts model (v(p), K-trans, k(ep)), Model-2: standard Tofts model (K-trans, k(ep)), and Model-3: a 3-parameter heuristic model (T-c, A, C). By analyzing lesions from same patients, the differences in whole body hemodynamics thus the blood kinetics could be controlled. Two questions were addressed in this study: i) What is the association between pharmacokinetic parameters analyzed from multiple cancers of identical pathology in same patients?; and ii) What is the difference between secondary malignant lesions and secondary benign lesions with reference to the primary cancer? All three models could fit the enhancement kinetics satisfactorily. Regardless of the analysis model the parameter obtained from the primary cancer and the secondary cancer showed significant correlations. In comparison between Group-1 and Group-2 subjects, the wash-out parameter k(ep) in Models-1 and 2 could significantly differentiate benign from malignant lesions, but not the magnitude parameters, K-trans in Model-2 or the parameter A in Model-3. If analyzed using appropriate models the early up-slope parameters, vp in Model-1 and Tc in Model-3, might be able to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. When more data are available a reference database can be established with the method described in this study, and from which to determine the likelihood of malignancy for each incidental lesion found in preoperative MRI, with reference to the primary cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 263
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   The effects of renal variation upon measurements of perfusion and leakage volume in breast tumours [J].
Ahearn, TS ;
Staff, RT ;
Redpath, TW ;
Semple, SIK .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (10) :2041-2051
[2]   Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Bedrosian, I ;
Mick, R ;
Orel, SG ;
Schnall, M ;
Reynolds, C ;
Spitz, FR ;
Callans, LS ;
Buzby, GP ;
Rosato, EF ;
Fraker, DL ;
Czerniecki, BJ .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (03) :468-473
[3]   BREAST-TUMORS - COMPARATIVE ACCURACY OF MR-IMAGING RELATIVE TO MAMMOGRAPHY AND US FOR DEMONSTRATING EXTENT [J].
BOETES, C ;
MUS, RDM ;
HOLLAND, R ;
BARENTSZ, JO ;
STRIJK, SP ;
WOBBES, T ;
HENDRIKS, JHCL ;
RUYS, SHJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (03) :743-747
[4]   Incidental enhancing lesions found on MR imaging of the breast [J].
Brown, J ;
Smith, RC ;
Lee, CH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (05) :1249-1254
[5]   Microvessel density in invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI [J].
Buckley, DL ;
Drew, PJ ;
Mussurakis, S ;
Monson, JRT ;
Horsman, A .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (03) :461-464
[6]   Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography [J].
Davis, PL ;
Staiger, MJ ;
Harris, KB ;
Ganott, MA ;
Klementaviciene, J ;
McCarthy, KS ;
Tobon, H .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1996, 37 (01) :1-9
[7]   Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: Evidence for improved preoperative staging [J].
Esserman, L ;
Hylton, N ;
Yassa, L ;
Barclay, J ;
Frankel, S ;
Sickles, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :110-119
[8]   The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer [J].
Fischer, U ;
Zachariae, O ;
Baum, F ;
von Heyden, D ;
Funke, M ;
Liersch, T .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (10) :1725-1731
[9]   Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach [J].
Fischer, U ;
Kopka, L ;
Grabbe, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (03) :881-888
[10]   Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: Experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and correlation with tumor angiogenesis [J].
Hulka, CA ;
Edmister, WB ;
Smith, BL ;
Tan, LJ ;
Sgroi, DC ;
Campbell, T ;
Kopans, DB ;
Weisskoff, RM .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (03) :837-842