Political Economy after Neoliberalism

被引:1
作者
Fligstein, Neil [1 ]
Vogel, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Sociol, 410 Social Sci Budding, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Polit Sci, 210 Social Sci Bldg, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY-EKONOMICHESKAYA SOTSIOLOGIYA | 2021年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
political economy; neoliberalism; markets; government; varieties of capitalism; critique;
D O I
10.17323/1726-3247-2021-4-35-48
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The Journal of Economic Sociology has published an article, "Political Economy after Neoliberalism," by one of the most influential figures in the tradition of New Economic Sociology, Neil Fligstein, and economic historian and comparative political economy scientist Steven Vogel. The article, originally published in Boston Review, was re-posted on the website of the professional online community Economic Sociology & Political Economy (ES/PE) and became one of the most-read texts in 2020. The authors offer a broad review of the current literature in the realm of economic sociology, economic history, and political economy, and articulate a theoretical and practical alternative to the mainstream economic view of the nature of markets and the role of the state regulation of the economy. The text explores the causes and consequences of the crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic and highlights the relationship between the crisis management measures adopted in different countries, their institutional arrangements, and the current balance of power. Fligstein and Vogel define three theoretical principles of the new political economy and then demonstrate its heuristic potential by analyzing the responses to the pandemic by the authorities and the United States and German markets. Strong attention is paid to the analysis of the practical consequences of the political economy project proposed by the authors: according to Fligstein and Vogel, accumulated knowledge allows the social sciences to participate in determining the preferred development scenarios of modern capitalism.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 48
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Revisiting conflict: Neoliberalism at work in the gig economy [J].
Tirapani, Alessandro Niccolo ;
Willmott, Hugh .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2023, 76 (01) :53-86
[42]   Demand, dysfunction and distribution: The UK growth model from neoliberalism to the knowledge economy [J].
O'Donovan, Nick .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2023, 25 (01) :178-196
[43]   THE SOCIOLOGY OF AGRICULTURE IN TRANSITION: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF AGRICULTURE AFTER BIOTECHNOLOGY [J].
Pechlaner, Gabriela .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY-CAHIERS CANADIENS DE SOCIOLOGIE, 2010, 35 (02) :243-269
[44]   OLIGARCHIC NEOLIBERALISM AND ITS SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES [J].
Gusmao Filho, Miguel D. ;
Goncalves Neto, Joao da Cruz .
HUMANIDADES & INOVACAO, 2022, 9 (17) :157-174
[46]   Neoliberalism as a Political Programme and Elements of its Implementation [J].
Olah, Daniel .
PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY-HUNGARY, 2018, 63 (01) :96-112
[47]   Political economy and political correctness [J].
Arye L. Hillman .
Public Choice, 1998, 96 :219-239
[48]   The Political and Moral Economies of Neoliberalism: Mises and Hayek [J].
Rodrigues, Joao .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2013, 37 (05) :1001-1017
[49]   THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF EUROPEANIZED FINANCIAL REGULATION [J].
Mugge, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2013, 20 (03) :458-470
[50]   THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF FISCAL DEFICITS: A SURVEY [J].
Eslava, Marcela .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2011, 25 (04) :645-673