Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for peripheral zone prostate cancer: the influence of the b-value combination on the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient

被引:3
作者
Rezaeian, Abbas [1 ]
Ostovari, Mohsen [2 ]
Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi, Mojtab [3 ]
Khanbabae, Hashem [4 ]
机构
[1] Lorestan Univ Med Sci, Sch Allied Med Sci, Dept Radiol Technol, Khorramabad, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys & Med Engn, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed Sci, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Kermanshah, Iran
[4] Kerman Univ Med Sci, Fac Allied Med, Dept Radiol Sci & Med Phys, Kerman, Iran
关键词
prostate cancer; ADC; detection; b-value; diffusion weighted; MRI;
D O I
10.5114/pjr.2022.115715
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Diffusion-weighted imaging as a noninvasive functional modality plays a valuable role in the evaluation of prostate cancer. However, there is still no agreement on the number and range of b-values to be used. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of b-value choice on the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for prostate cancer detection. Material and methods: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with abnormal digital rectal examination findings and raised scrum prostate-specific antigen were chosen for magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate before systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. ADC values for each ROI were calculated from different b-value combinations (0-1600 s/mm(2)) by a monoexponential model. Mann-Whitney and the paired-sample t-test were used to compare the mean ADC values for malignant lesions and noncancerous tissues. ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ADC values in distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue ROIs. Results: The differences between mean ADC values of malignant lesions and contralateral healthy tissues were significant for all the pairs of b-value combinations. The pair of b-values 50 and 1200 provided the highest AUC (0.94), with a sensitivity of 90.2%, a specificity of 92.6%, and an accuracy of 91.2% at an ADC cut-off of 1.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Conclusions: Our study showed that using a 1.5-Testa MRI scanner the diagnostic performance of ADC values estimated from the b-value pair 50 and 1200 s/mm(2) was highest. However, some other b-value pairs provided statically comparable diagnostic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:E215 / E219
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] A Rezaeian, 2019, J Biomed Phys Eng, V9, P453, DOI 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.811
  • [2] Apparent diffusion coefficient in the analysis of prostate cancer: determination of optimal b-value pair to differentiate normal from malignant tissue
    Adubeiro, Nuno
    Nogueira, Maria Luisa
    Nunes, Rita G.
    Ferreira, Hugo Alexandre
    Ribeiro, Eduardo
    Ferreira La Fuente, Jose Maria
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2018, 47 : 90 - 95
  • [3] Optimal High b-Value for Diffusion Weighted MRI in Diagnosing High Risk Prostate Cancers in the Peripheral Zone
    Agarwal, Harsh K.
    Mertan, Francesca V.
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Bernardo, Marcelino
    Senegas, Julien
    Keupp, Jochen
    Daar, Dagane
    Merino, Maria
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 45 (01) : 125 - 131
  • [4] Diffusion in prostate cancer detection on a 3T scanner: How many b-values are needed?
    de Perrot, Thomas
    Scheffler, Max
    Boto, Jose
    Delattre, Benedicte M. A.
    Combescure, Christophe
    Pusztaszeri, Marc
    Tille, Jean-Christophe
    Iselin, Christophe
    Vallee, Jean-Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (03) : 601 - 609
  • [5] Advanced Diffusion-weighted Imaging Modeling for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Correlation with Quantitative Histopathologic Tumor Tissue Composition-A Hypothesis-generating Study
    Hectors, Stefanie J.
    Semaan, Sahar
    Song, Christopher
    Lewis, Sara
    Haines, George K.
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Taouli, Bachir
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (03) : 938 - 948
  • [6] Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection, Localization, and Staging
    Hoeks, Caroline M. A.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Yakar, Derya
    Somford, Diederik M.
    Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J.
    Scheenen, Tom W. J.
    Vos, Pieter C.
    Huisman, Henkjan
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Heerschap, Arend
    Fuetterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (01) : 46 - 66
  • [7] Clinical Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion MR Imaging: Past, Present, and Future
    Iima, Mami
    Le Bihan, Denis
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (01) : 13 - 32
  • [8] Characterization of prostate cancer with MR spectroscopic imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla
    Mazaheri, Yousef
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    Goldman, Debra A.
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Takeda, Toshikazu
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Akin, Oguz
    Hricak, Hedvig
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 55 : 93 - 102
  • [9] What is the optimal b value in diffusion-weighted MR imaging to depict prostate cancer at 3T?
    Metens, T.
    Miranda, D.
    Absil, J.
    Matos, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (03) : 703 - 709
  • [10] Fusion of high b-value diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR images improves identification of lymph nodes in the pelvis
    Mir, N.
    Sohaib, S. A.
    Collins, D.
    Koh, D. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2010, 54 (04) : 358 - 364