Selection Bias Tracking and Detailed Subset Comparison for High-Dimensional Data

被引:15
作者
Borland, David [1 ]
Wang, Wenyuan [2 ]
Zhang, Jonathan [3 ]
Shrestha, Joshua [4 ]
Gotz, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, RENCI, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Informat & Lib Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Comp Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
High-dimensional visualization; visual analytics; cohort selection; medical informatics; selection bias; VISUAL ANALYTICS; ADJUST; VISUALIZATION;
D O I
10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934209
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The collection of large, complex datasets has become common across a wide variety of domains. Visual analytics tools increasingly play a key role in exploring and answering complex questions about these large datasets. However, many visualizations are not designed to concurrently visualize the large number of dimensions present in complex datasets (e.g. tens of thousands of distinct codes in an electronic health record system). This fact, combined with the ability of many visual analytics systems to enable rapid, ad-hoc specification of groups, or cohorts, of individuals based on a small subset of visualized dimensions, leads to the possibility of introducing selection when the user creates a cohort based on a specified set of dimensions, differences across many other unseen dimensions may also be introduced. These unintended side effects may result in the cohort no longer being representative of the larger population intended to be studied, which can negatively affect the validity of subsequent analyses. We present techniques for selection bias tracking and visualization that can be incorporated into high-dimensional exploratory visual analytics systems, with a focus on medical data with existing data hierarchies. These techniques include: (1) tree-based cohort provenance and visualization, including a user-specified baseline cohort that all other cohorts are compared against, and visual encoding of cohort, which indicates where selection bias may have occurred, and (2) a set of visualizations, including a novel icicle-plot based visualization, to compare in detail the per-dimension differences between the baseline and a user-specified focus cohort. These techniques are integrated into a medical temporal event sequence visual analytics tool. We present example use cases and report findings from domain expert user interviews.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 439
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]   The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations [J].
Shneiderman, B .
IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON VISUAL LANGUAGES, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, :336-343
[42]   MINIMUM HELLINGER DISTANCE ESTIMATION FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COUNT DATA [J].
SIMPSON, DG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1987, 82 (399) :802-807
[43]   Stable Treemaps via Local Moves [J].
Sondag, Max ;
Speckmann, Bettina ;
Verbeek, Kevin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2018, 24 (01) :729-738
[44]  
Spackman KA, 1997, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, P640
[45]  
Sud Avneesh, 2010, Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Voronoi Diagrams in Science and Engineering (ISVD 2010), P85, DOI 10.1109/ISVD.2010.16
[46]  
Swofford David L., 1996, P407
[47]   Enhanced Spatial Stability with Hilbert and Moore Treemaps [J].
Tak, Susanne ;
Cockburn, Andy .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2013, 19 (01) :141-148
[48]   A visual analytics agenda [J].
Thomas, JJ ;
Cook, KA .
IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2006, 26 (01) :10-13
[49]   A Method to Visualize and Adjust for Selection Bias in Prevalent Cohort Studies [J].
Torner, Anna ;
Dickman, Paul ;
Duberg, Ann-Sofi ;
Kristinsson, Sigurdur ;
Landgren, Ola ;
Bjorkholm, Magnus ;
Svensson, Ake .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 174 (08) :969-976
[50]   A Proposed Method to Adjust for Selection Bias in Cohort Studies [J].
Torner, Anna ;
Duberg, Ann-Sofi ;
Dickman, Paul ;
Svensson, Ake .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 171 (05) :602-608