Selection Bias Tracking and Detailed Subset Comparison for High-Dimensional Data

被引:15
作者
Borland, David [1 ]
Wang, Wenyuan [2 ]
Zhang, Jonathan [3 ]
Shrestha, Joshua [4 ]
Gotz, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, RENCI, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Informat & Lib Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Comp Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
High-dimensional visualization; visual analytics; cohort selection; medical informatics; selection bias; VISUAL ANALYTICS; ADJUST; VISUALIZATION;
D O I
10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934209
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The collection of large, complex datasets has become common across a wide variety of domains. Visual analytics tools increasingly play a key role in exploring and answering complex questions about these large datasets. However, many visualizations are not designed to concurrently visualize the large number of dimensions present in complex datasets (e.g. tens of thousands of distinct codes in an electronic health record system). This fact, combined with the ability of many visual analytics systems to enable rapid, ad-hoc specification of groups, or cohorts, of individuals based on a small subset of visualized dimensions, leads to the possibility of introducing selection when the user creates a cohort based on a specified set of dimensions, differences across many other unseen dimensions may also be introduced. These unintended side effects may result in the cohort no longer being representative of the larger population intended to be studied, which can negatively affect the validity of subsequent analyses. We present techniques for selection bias tracking and visualization that can be incorporated into high-dimensional exploratory visual analytics systems, with a focus on medical data with existing data hierarchies. These techniques include: (1) tree-based cohort provenance and visualization, including a user-specified baseline cohort that all other cohorts are compared against, and visual encoding of cohort, which indicates where selection bias may have occurred, and (2) a set of visualizations, including a novel icicle-plot based visualization, to compare in detail the per-dimension differences between the baseline and a user-specified focus cohort. These techniques are integrated into a medical temporal event sequence visual analytics tool. We present example use cases and report findings from domain expert user interviews.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 439
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Aigner Wolfgang, 2011, Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, V5, P207, DOI 10.1561/1100000039
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Information Visualization in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, DOI [DOI 10.1145/2678025.2701407, 10.1145/2678025.2701407, 10.1145/2678025.27014072]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Cognitive biases in visualizations, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-95831-63, 10.1007/978-3-319-95831-6_3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-95831-6_3, 10.1007/978-3-319-95831-]
[5]  
[Anonymous], ICD ICD 10 CM INT CL
[6]  
[Anonymous], IEEE T VISUALIZATION
[7]  
Baur D., 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces, P255, DOI DOI 10.1145/2396636.2396675
[8]   Contextual Visualization Making the Unseen Visible to Combat Bias During Visual Analysis [J].
Borland, David ;
Wang, Wenyuan ;
Gotz, David .
IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 38 (06) :17-23
[9]  
Bremm S., 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, P31, DOI 10.1109/VAST.2011.6102439
[10]  
Cho I, 2017, IEEE CONF VIS ANAL, P116, DOI 10.1109/VAST.2017.8585665