Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration

被引:294
作者
van Rijnsoever, Frank J. [1 ,2 ]
Hessels, Laurens K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Sci Syst Assessment, Rathenau Inst, NL-2593 HW The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Interdisciplinarity; Scientific career; Academic rank; Research collaboration; KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION; MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY; CROSS-DISCIPLINARY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CO-AUTHORSHIPS; SCIENCE; UNIVERSITY; CAREER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
There is a lack of understanding regarding the optimal conditions for interdisciplinary research. This study investigates what characteristics of researchers are associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaborations and what collaborations are most rewarding in different scientific disciplines. Our results confirm that female scientists are more engaged in interdisciplinary research collaborations. Further, a scientist's years of research experience are positively related with both types of collaboration. Work experience in firms or governmental organizations increases the propensity of interdisciplinary collaborations, but decreases that of disciplinary collaborations. Disciplinary collaborations occur more frequent in basic disciplines; interdisciplinary collaborations more in strategic disciplines. We also found that in both types of disciplines, disciplinary collaborations contribute more to career development than interdisciplinary collaborations. We conclude with three recommendations for science and innovation policy, while emphasising the need to distinguish between different scientific disciplines. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 472
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
[51]  
Nooteboom B., 2000, J MANAG GOV, V4, P69, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009941416749
[52]   Coauthorship dynamics and knowledge capital: The patterns of cross-disciplinary collaboration in information systems research [J].
Oh, W ;
Choi, JN ;
Kim, K .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2005, 22 (03) :265-292
[53]   Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity [J].
Porter, Alan L. ;
Cohen, Alex S. ;
Roessner, J. David ;
Perreault, Marty .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, 72 (01) :117-147
[54]   Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture [J].
Porter, Alan L. ;
Roessner, J. David ;
Cohen, Alex S. ;
Perreault, Marty .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2006, 15 (03) :187-195
[55]   Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time [J].
Porter, Alan L. ;
Rafols, Ismael .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, 81 (03) :719-745
[56]  
Poti B., 2007, Science and Public Policy, V34, P417, DOI [10.3152/030234207X239401, DOI 10.3152/030234207X239401]
[57]  
Qin J, 1997, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V48, P893, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO
[58]  
2-X
[59]   How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors [J].
Rafols, Ismael ;
Meyer, Martin .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, 70 (03) :633-650
[60]  
Rhoten D., 2004, ITEMS ISSUES, V5, P6