The Reactions of Adolescents, Parents and Clinicians to Participating in Qualitative Research Interviews Regarding Adolescents Bereaved by Suicide and Other Traumatic Death

被引:4
作者
Andriessen, Karl [1 ]
Krysinska, Karolina [1 ]
Rickwood, Debra [2 ]
Pirkis, Jane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Mental Hlth, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Canberra, Fac Hlth, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
grief; bereavement; suicide; traumatic death; research participation; ethics; research ethics; ETHICAL-ISSUES; PSYCHOLOGICAL AUTOPSY; MENTAL-HEALTH; EXPERIENCES; RECRUITMENT; CHALLENGES; SIBLINGS; BENEFITS; VIOLENCE; HELPFUL;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19010452
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There are concerns that involving adolescents bereaved by suicide and other traumatic death in research may cause distress and harm. However, no study has investigated such bereaved adolescents' research experiences. In addition, no study has looked at the experiences of parents and clinicians as participants in adolescent suicide and traumatic death bereavement research. This study aimed to explore the short-term impact of research participation experienced by adolescents, parents, and clinicians. A total of 61 participants (adolescents, n = 17; parents, n = 12; clinicians, n = 32) filled out a short survey within two weeks of having taken part in a qualitative interview study. Data were analyzed descriptively. Most participants had experienced no distress while participating and no negative effects of participating; rather, participation was experienced as helpful for them and they would highly recommend participating in a study like this to others. A few adolescents and parents reported some distress, related to anxiety about participation and the unpleasantness of grief memories. The study clearly indicates that bereaved adolescents, parents and clinicians can safely participate in research interviews regarding their experiences of grief and help after suicide, generally valuing the opportunity to share their experience. To prevent and mitigate potential distress, training of research staff and implementation of appropriate participant distress protocols are imperative. Future studies could include longitudinal follow-up of participants to assess any longer-term consequences.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [31] MEANING-MAKING THROUGH PSYCHOLOGICAL AUTOPSY INTERVIEWS: THE VALUE OF PARTICIPATING IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH FOR THOSE BEREAVED BY SUICIDE
    Dyregrov, Kari Madeleine
    Dieserud, Gudrun
    Hjelmeland, Heidi Marie
    Straiton, Melanie
    Rasmussen, Mette Lyberg
    Knizek, Birthe Loa
    Leenaars, Antoon Adrian
    [J]. DEATH STUDIES, 2011, 35 (08) : 685 - 710
  • [32] Bereaved siblings' perception of participating in research-a nationwide study
    Eilegard, Alexandra
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Kreicbergs, Ulrika
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 (02) : 411 - 416
  • [33] Children's Experiences of Completing a Computer-Based Violence Survey: Ethical Implications
    Ellonen, Noora
    Poso, Tarja
    [J]. CHILDREN & SOCIETY, 2011, 25 (06) : 470 - 481
  • [34] Feigelman W., 2012, Devastating losses: How parents cope with the death of a child to suicide or drugs
  • [35] Examining longer-term effects of parental death in adolescents and young adults: Evidence from the national longitudinal survey of adolescent to adult health
    Feigelman, William
    Rosen, Zohn
    Joiner, Thomas
    Silva, Caroline
    Mueller, Anna S.
    [J]. DEATH STUDIES, 2017, 41 (03) : 133 - 143
  • [36] Parenting After the Death of a Spouse
    Glazer, Hilda R.
    Clark, Myra D.
    Thomas, Rebecca
    Haxton, Heather
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 277 (08) : 532 - 536
  • [37] Thematic Analysis
    Glisczinski, Dan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION, 2018, 16 (03) : 175 - 175
  • [38] How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability
    Guest, Greg
    Bunce, Arwen
    Johnson, Laura
    [J]. FIELD METHODS, 2006, 18 (01) : 59 - 82
  • [39] Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study
    Guest, Greg
    Namey, Emily
    Taylor, Jamilah
    Eley, Natalie
    McKenna, Kevin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 20 (06) : 693 - 708
  • [40] How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes
    Guest, Greg
    Namey, Emily
    McKenna, Kevin
    [J]. FIELD METHODS, 2017, 29 (01) : 3 - 22