Consumer trust repair: A critical literature review

被引:67
作者
Bozic, Branko [1 ]
机构
[1] NEOMA Business Sch, Mont St Aignan, France
关键词
Consumer trust repair; Consumer trust; Literature review; Conceptual framework; INTEGRITY; TRUSTWORTHINESS; ORGANIZATIONS; PERSPECTIVE; COMPETENCE; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; REPUTATION; VIOLATION; BRANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.emj.2017.02.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Consumers are fundamental to organisational functioning and survival. Their loyalty, commitment, product acceptance and good long-term relationships with firms and brands are underpinned by their trust. Unfortunately, over the last decade or so, we have witnessed some of the more spectacular violations of consumer trust in the history of business. This has led to negative consequences, such as loss of competitive advantage, rage, lack of commitment and decrease in turnover. Consequently, study of trust repair has become an important theoretical concern for a growing number of trust scholars. This article reviews and synthesises existing theory and research on the topic. It first sketches general characteristics of the consumer trust repair literature, including its meta-theoretical underpinning. It then identifies specific strategies associated with consumer trust repair and synthesises them into five categories of trust repair strategies. In addition, this paper highlights theoretical processes that explain why/how trust repair strategies work. Third, the paper proposes six fruitful avenues for future research. This study contributes to the field of consumer trust repair research by critically reviewing and synthesising emerging theory and research on strategies associated with consumer trust repair, by showing why and how these strategies work and by identifying most fruitful research areas. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 547
页数:10
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   When good brands do bad [J].
Aaker, J ;
Fournier, S ;
Brasel, SA .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (01) :1-16
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, APPROACHES SOCIAL EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PARADIGMATIC CONTROV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Dictionary
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, RES DESIGN QUALITATI
[6]   Research on trust: a bibliography and brief bibliometric analysis of the special issue submissions [J].
Arnott, David C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2007, 41 (9-10) :1203-1240
[7]   Trust - current thinking and future research [J].
Arnott, David C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2007, 41 (9-10) :981-987
[8]   Repairing Trust in Organizations and Institutions: Toward a Conceptual Framework [J].
Bachmann, Reinhard ;
Gillespie, Nicole ;
Priem, Richard .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2015, 36 (09) :1123-1142
[9]   Trust violation and repair: The information privacy perspective [J].
Bansal, Gaurav ;
Zahedi, Fatemeh Mariam .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2015, 71 :62-77
[10]   Corporate Reputation: The Definitional Landscape [J].
Barnett, Michael ;
Jermier, John ;
Lafferty, Barbara .
CORPORATE REPUTATION REVIEW, 2006, 9 (01) :26-38