Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments

被引:100
作者
Mohamad, Mimi Mohaffyza [1 ]
Sulaiman, Nor Lisa [1 ]
Sern, Lai Chee [1 ]
Salleh, Kahirol Mohd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Fac Tech & Vocat Educ, Dept Engn Educ, Parit Raja, Malaysia
来源
4TH WORLD CONGRESS ON TECHNICAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING (4THWOCTVET) | 2015年 / 204卷
关键词
Validity and Reliability; Learning Styles; Cognitive;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper discussed how the applying of Rasch Model in validity and reliability of research instruments. Three sets of research instruments were developed in this study. The Felder-Solomon Index of Learning Styles (ILS) is essential to find out the learning style abilities of learners. Students' Perception in Cognitive Dimension (SPCD) was developed to identify student perception toward their cognitive abilities, and Students' Cognitive Mastery Achievement Test (CMAT) is used to measure student mastery in a particular subject. The study aims to produce empirical evidence of validity and reliability using the Rasch Model. A small survey was conducted on 28 vocational college students enrolled in the Building Construction course. The ILS consists of four constructs, whereas the SPCD and CMAT validate based on three constructs. The value of reliability was based on Cronbach alpha with appropriate values range. The construct validity was analyzed based on the Rasch model with infit and outfit mean square (MNSQ) value. Three experts in the building construction subject examined the content validity of SPCD and CMAT. Assessor agreement can be calculated as percent-agreement. Percent-agreement statistics can be calculated and explained easily. In summary, Rasch Model is suitable to apply in instrument validation process because the concept of item response theory. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 171
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, RASCH MEASUREMENT T
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, Rasch model fundamentals: Scale construct and measurement structure
  • [3] Bond T.G., 2003, METODOLOG A CIENCIAS, V5, P179
  • [4] Creswell JohnW., 2012, Educational Research: Planing, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Data
  • [5] Cronbach L.J., 1984, Essentials of psychological testing, V4
  • [6] Darusalam G., 2008, J I PERGURAN ISLAM, P61
  • [7] Fraenkel J., 1996, DESIGN EVALUATE RES
  • [8] Nordin A. B., 2008, Penaksiran dalam pendidikan dan sains sosial
  • [9] Stemler S.E., 2004, A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches
  • [10] Tom K, 2000, ED TESTING MEASUREME