Obstetrical provider knowledge and attitudes towards cell-free DNA screening: results of a cross-sectional national survey

被引:9
作者
Chan, Wilson V. [1 ]
Johnson, Jo-Ann [1 ]
Wilson, R. Douglas [1 ]
Metcalfe, Amy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Foothills Med Ctr, 4th Floor North Tower,1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
来源
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH | 2018年 / 18卷
关键词
NIPT; Cell-free DNA; cfDNA; Prenatal diagnosis; Screening; FREE FETAL DNA; POSITION STATEMENT; MATERNAL PLASMA; 1ST TRIMESTER; ANEUPLOIDY; IMPLEMENTATION; PROFESSIONALS; UPDATE; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-018-1662-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening has recently acquired tremendous attention, promising patients and healthcare providers a more accurate prenatal screen for aneuploidy than other current screening modalities. It is unclear how much knowledge regarding cfDNA screening obstetrical providers possess which has important implications for the quality and content of the informed consent patients receive. Methods: A survey was designed to assess obstetrical provider knowledge and attitudes towards cfDNA screening and distributed online through the Society of Obstetricians & Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC). Chi-squared tests were used to detect differences in knowledge and attitudes between groups. Results: 207 respondents completed the survey, composed of 60.6% Obstetricians/Gynecologists (OB/GYN), 15.4% Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) specialists, 16.5% General Practitioners (GP), and 7.5% Midwives (MW). MFM demonstrated a significant trend of being most knowledgeable about cfDNA screening followed by OB/GYN, GP, and lastly MW in almost all aspects of cfDNA screening. All groups demonstrated an overall positive attitude towards cfDNA screening; however, OB/GYN and MFM demonstrated a significantly more positive attitude than GP and MW. Despite not yet being a diagnostic test, 19.4% of GP would offer termination of pregnancy immediately following a positive cfDNA screen result compared to none of the MFM and only few OB/GYN or MW. Conclusions: We have demonstrated that different types of obstetrical providers possess varying amounts of knowledge regarding cfDNA screening with MFM currently having greater knowledge to all other groups. All obstetrical providers must have adequate prenatal screening understanding so that we can embrace the benefits of this novel and promising technology while protecting the integrity of the informed consent process.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Fetal fraction in maternal plasma cell-free DNA at 11-13 weeks' gestation: relation to maternal and fetal characteristics
    Ashoor, G.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Poon, L. C. Y.
    Rezende, J. C.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 41 (01) : 26 - 32
  • [2] Trisomy 13 detection in the first trimester of pregnancy using a chromosome-selective cell-free DNA analysis method
    Ashoor, G.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Wang, E.
    Struble, C.
    Oliphant, A.
    Song, K.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 41 (01) : 21 - 25
  • [3] Chromosome-selective sequencing of maternal plasma cell-free DNA for first-trimester detection of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18
    Ashoor, Ghalia
    Syngelaki, Argyro
    Wagner, Marion
    Birdir, Cahit
    Nicolaides, Kypros H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (04) : 322.e1 - 322.e5
  • [4] Audibert F, 2017, J OBSTET GYNAECOL CA, V39, P805, DOI 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.032
  • [5] BC PS, 2017, NON PREN TEST FUND N
  • [6] Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis
    Benn, PA
    Egan, JFX
    Fang, M
    Smith-Bindman, R
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (06) : 1255 - 1260
  • [7] Position statement from the Chromosome Abnormality Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis
    Benn, Peter
    Borrell, Antoni
    Chiu, Rossa W. K.
    Cuckle, Howard
    Dugoff, Lorraine
    Faas, Brigitte
    Gross, Susan
    Huang, Tianhua
    Johnson, Joann
    Maymon, Ron
    Norton, Mary
    Odibo, Anthony
    Schielen, Peter
    Spencer, Kevin
    Wright, Dave
    Yaron, Yuval
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 35 (08) : 725 - 734
  • [8] Survey of US obstetrician opinions regarding NIPT use in general practice: implementation and barriers
    Brewer, Justin
    Demers, Lisa
    Musci, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (15) : 1793 - 1796
  • [9] Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys
    Cunningham, Ceara Tess
    Quan, Hude
    Hemmelgarn, Brenda
    Noseworthy, Tom
    Beck, Cynthia A.
    Dixon, Elijah
    Samuel, Susan
    Ghali, William A.
    Sykes, Lindsay L.
    Jette, Nathalie
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [10] Patient choice and clinical outcomes following positive noninvasive prenatal screening for aneuploidy with cell-free DNA (cfDNA)
    Dobson, Lori J.
    Reiff, Emily S.
    Little, Sarah E.
    Wilkins-Haug, Louise
    Bromley, Bryann
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2016, 36 (05) : 456 - 462