Bioethanol Potentials and Life-Cycle Assessments of Biofuel Feedstocks

被引:23
|
作者
Bonin, Catherine [1 ]
Lal, Rattan [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Carbon Management & Sequestrat Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
bioenergy; greenhouse gas; carbon budget; lignocellulosic ethanol; SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION; LAND-USE CHANGE; OF-THE-ART; GREENHOUSE-GAS; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; BIOENERGY SYSTEMS; WATER FOOTPRINT; NET ENERGY; 2ND-GENERATION BIOFUELS; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1080/07352689.2011.645438
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
A wide range of bioenergy crops has been proposed as c that can serve as renewable and ecologically sound substitutes to fossil fuels. In the United States, corn grain (Zea mays) ethanol is the primary biofuel, with over 49 billion liters produced in 2010. Along with the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 mandate, concerns about competition for food, land availability, nutrient and water requirements, energy balances, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have prompted researchers to investigate other potential feedstocks. These include second-generation lignocellulosic feedstock and third-generation biodiesel from microalgae and cyanobacteria. However, each feedstock option has associated benefits and consequences for its use. One technique used to evaluate the energy efficiency of bioenergy production systems is the life-cycle assessment (LCA), where system inputs and outputs are computed in terms of either C or energy equivalents to assess the net gains in energy or C offsets. This article collates and synthesizes information about feedstock production options. Results show a wide range of calculated energy and GHG balances, even for the same feedstock species. Discrepancies in LCA and uncertainty thus make direct comparisons difficult and prevent a consensus in determining feedstock suitability. Recommendations must be based upon LCA model assumptions, crop species, cultivation methods, management practices, and energy conversion choices. Currently lignocellulosic feedstock, while a better alternative than corn grain, is not a long-term viable energy source. New feedstocks and technologies are necessary if bioenergy is to be C-neutral and efficient in energy production and land use. Although C fluxes are considered in LCA, one important ecosystem C stock that has previously been left out of many LCA models is changes to soil organic carbon (SOC). Future research, developments, and priorities are discussed for options to produce low C fuel sources and stabilize the climate.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 289
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparaison of the various electricity generation systems on the basis of life-cycle assessments
    Gagnon, Luc
    Bélanger, Camille
    Revue de l'Energie, 2003, (546): : 285 - 294
  • [32] LIFE-CYCLE
    TOMSON, DPC
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 295 (6613): : 1644 - 1645
  • [33] Life-cycle energy efficiency and environmental impacts of bioethanol production from sweet potato
    Wang, Mingxin
    Shi, Yu
    Xia, Xunfeng
    Li, Dinglong
    Chen, Qun
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 133 : 285 - 292
  • [34] Life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from three feedstocks and two fermentation waste reutilization schemes
    Chang, Fang-Chih
    Lin, Lang-Dong
    Ko, Chun-Han
    Hsieh, Hsin-Chuan
    Yang, Bing-Yuan
    Chen, Wen-Hua
    Hwang, Wen-Song
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 : 973 - 979
  • [35] Life-Cycle Analysis and Modeling (LCAM) of Jatropha as Biofuel in Indian Dynamic Economic Environment
    Sinha, Sangeeta
    Suzuki, Seiichi
    Kojima, Toshinori
    Kato, Shigeru
    Kumar, Sanjay
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, 2014, 47 (04) : 358 - 362
  • [36] NEW TOOLS THAT CAN HELP ARCHITECTS MAKE LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS OF PRODUCTS
    CHUSID, M
    PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE, 1991, 72 (12): : 49 - 49
  • [37] Mixed method review for integrating building information modeling and life-cycle assessments
    Seyis, Senem
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 173
  • [38] Integrating emerging metal risk assessment technologies into life-cycle impact assessments
    Adams, WJ
    LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF METALS: ISSUES AND RESEARCH DIRECTIONS, 2003, : 171 - 177
  • [39] Impacts of the Allocation Assumption in Life-Cycle Assessments of Wood-Based Panels
    Taylor, Adam M.
    Bergman, Richard D.
    Puettmann, Maureen E.
    Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2017, 67 (5-6) : 390 - 396
  • [40] From methanol to power: Energy, economic and life-cycle assessments of several pathways
    Zhao, Ning
    Yang, Jinyu
    Ai, Tianchao
    Wang, Jiangjiang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2025, 486