Bioethanol Potentials and Life-Cycle Assessments of Biofuel Feedstocks

被引:23
|
作者
Bonin, Catherine [1 ]
Lal, Rattan [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Carbon Management & Sequestrat Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
bioenergy; greenhouse gas; carbon budget; lignocellulosic ethanol; SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION; LAND-USE CHANGE; OF-THE-ART; GREENHOUSE-GAS; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; BIOENERGY SYSTEMS; WATER FOOTPRINT; NET ENERGY; 2ND-GENERATION BIOFUELS; BIODIESEL PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1080/07352689.2011.645438
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
A wide range of bioenergy crops has been proposed as c that can serve as renewable and ecologically sound substitutes to fossil fuels. In the United States, corn grain (Zea mays) ethanol is the primary biofuel, with over 49 billion liters produced in 2010. Along with the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 mandate, concerns about competition for food, land availability, nutrient and water requirements, energy balances, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have prompted researchers to investigate other potential feedstocks. These include second-generation lignocellulosic feedstock and third-generation biodiesel from microalgae and cyanobacteria. However, each feedstock option has associated benefits and consequences for its use. One technique used to evaluate the energy efficiency of bioenergy production systems is the life-cycle assessment (LCA), where system inputs and outputs are computed in terms of either C or energy equivalents to assess the net gains in energy or C offsets. This article collates and synthesizes information about feedstock production options. Results show a wide range of calculated energy and GHG balances, even for the same feedstock species. Discrepancies in LCA and uncertainty thus make direct comparisons difficult and prevent a consensus in determining feedstock suitability. Recommendations must be based upon LCA model assumptions, crop species, cultivation methods, management practices, and energy conversion choices. Currently lignocellulosic feedstock, while a better alternative than corn grain, is not a long-term viable energy source. New feedstocks and technologies are necessary if bioenergy is to be C-neutral and efficient in energy production and land use. Although C fluxes are considered in LCA, one important ecosystem C stock that has previously been left out of many LCA models is changes to soil organic carbon (SOC). Future research, developments, and priorities are discussed for options to produce low C fuel sources and stabilize the climate.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 289
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS
    WANG, MQ
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 27 (13) : 2658 - &
  • [2] Comparative life-cycle assessments for biomass-to-ethanol production from different regional feedstocks
    Kemppainen, AJ
    Shonnard, DR
    BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 2005, 21 (04) : 1075 - 1084
  • [3] Life-cycle environmental impact assessments
    Gosse, G
    LeRoux, X
    Loubet, B
    INRA BIOCLIMATOLOGY DEPARTMENT RESEARCH COURSE, VOL 2: FROM PLANT CANOPY TO THE REGION, 1996, : 25 - 38
  • [4] Comparing life cycle assessments of different biofuel options
    Kendall, Alissa
    Yuan, Juhong
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 17 (03) : 439 - 443
  • [5] Notes on life-cycle assessments of vegetable oils
    Zemanek, G
    Reinhardt, GA
    FETT-LIPID, 1999, 101 (09): : 321 - 327
  • [6] Hybrid life-cycle assessment of algal biofuel production
    Malik, Arunima
    Lenzen, Manfred
    Ralph, Peter J.
    Tamburic, Bojan
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 184 : 436 - 443
  • [7] CONSIDERATIONS IN PERFORMING LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS ON FOREST PRODUCTS
    MINER, RA
    LUCIER, AA
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1994, 13 (08) : 1375 - 1380
  • [8] Consideration of metal availability and fate in life-cycle assessments
    Paquin, PR
    Di Toro, DM
    Mathew, R
    Santori, RC
    Wu, KB
    LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF METALS: ISSUES AND RESEARCH DIRECTIONS, 2003, : 248 - 257
  • [9] Life-Cycle Assessment of Brazilian Transport Biofuel and Electrification Pathways
    Glensor, Kain
    Rosa Munoz B., Maria
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (22)
  • [10] Biofuel Options for Marine Applications: Technoeconomic and Life-Cycle Analyses
    Tan, Eric C. D.
    Hawkins, Troy R.
    Lee, Uisung
    Tao, Ling
    Meyer, Pimphan A.
    Wang, Michael
    Thompson, Tom
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 55 (11) : 7561 - 7570