Acceptance of banana cultivars resistant to Black Sigatoka by the consumer market of Northeast Brazilian region

被引:0
作者
Garruti, Deborah dos Santos [1 ]
Matias, Melissa de Lima [2 ]
de Vasconcelos Facundo, Heliofabia Virginia [2 ]
Silva, Ebenezer de Oliveira [1 ]
da Costa, Juliana Nascimento [2 ]
Azevedo Pereira da Silva, Maria Aparecida [3 ]
机构
[1] Embrapa Agroind Trop, BR-60511110 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Ceara, Programa Posgrad Ciencia & Tecnol Alimentos, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas UNICAMP, Fac Engn Alimentos, Campinas, SP, Brazil
来源
CIENCIA RURAL | 2012年 / 42卷 / 05期
关键词
Musa spp; Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet; sensory analysis; affective tests; preference mapping;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The Black Sigatoka Disease is devastating to traditional banana cultivars. In Brazil, resistant cultivars are being developed but if the consumer's preference is not taken into account, the breeding program may not succeed. In this research the acceptability of four resistant cultivars was accessed in the Northeastern Brazilian region and compared to four commercial varieties. Two groups of consumers participated: young adults and housewives. Hedonic scale was applied to external appearance of bunches, global acceptance and acceptance of fruits' attributes (appearance without peel, aroma, flavor and texture). Preference and purchase intent were also evaluated. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Preference Mapping. Women and young adults showed similar opinions. 'Preciosa' and 'Pacovan Ken' cultivars showed to be the most promising ones. 'Preciosa' can already substitute the commercial 'Prata' and 'Pacovan' cultivars without impairing their global acceptability, but 'Pacovan Ken' still needs to be improved regarding its appearance.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 954
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] *ABEP, 2007, CRIT PADR CLASS EC B
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, SAS STAT AN SYST WIN
  • [3] Carr B.T., 1999, Sensory evaluation techniques
  • [4] Castro M. E. A., 2005, Fitopatologia Brasileira, V30, P668, DOI 10.1590/S0100-41582005000600018
  • [5] Cordeiro Zilton Jose M., 2005, Fitopatologia Brasileira, V30, P316, DOI 10.1590/S0100-41582005000300022
  • [6] FANCELLI M., 2003, SISTEMA PRODUCAO
  • [7] FAO, 2008, AGR DAT
  • [8] Ferrari J.T., 2005, Arq. Inst. Biol., V72, P133, DOI 10.1590/1808-1657v72p1332005
  • [9] GASPAROTTO L., 2003, S BRASILEIRO BANANIC, V5, P28
  • [10] IBGE, 2006, INF URB EC 2003