Beyond grade retention and social promotion: Promoting the social and academic competence of students

被引:58
作者
Jimerson, SR
Pletcher, SMW
Graydon, K
Schnurr, BL
Nickerson, AB
Kundert, DK
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Gevirtz Grad Sch Educ, Dept Counseling Clin & Soc Psychol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] SUNY Albany, Albany, NY 12222 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/pits.20132
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
During the past decade, amidst the current context emphasizing educational standards and accountability, the practice of grade retention has increased. The call for an end to social promotion has generated a variety of recommendations and legislation regarding promotion policies. This context has served as a catalyst for numerous debates regarding the use of grade retention and social promotion. In an era emphasizing evidence-based interventions, research indicates that neither grade retention nor social promotion is a successful strategy for improving educational success. Moreover, research also reveals prevention and intervention strategies that are likely to promote the social or academic competence of students at risk of poor school performance. It is essential that educational professionals are familiar with the research when implementing interventions to promote student success. School psychologists may use this article as a primer for teachers, administrators, and parents, as it provides a synthesis of research addressing the following important questions: (a) What are the demographic characteristics of retained students? (b) What are the effects of retention on academic and socioemotional outcomes? (c) What long-term outcomes are associated with grade retention? (d) What are students' perspectives regarding grade retention? (e) How does a developmental perspective enhance our understanding? (f) What are some empirically supported effective intervention strategies? Educational professionals are encouraged to incorporate evidence-based programs and policies to facilitate the success of all students. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 97
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RETENTION - UNJUSTIFIABLE, DISCRIMINATORY AND NOXIOUS EDUCATIONAL POLICY [J].
ABIDIN, RR ;
GOLLADAY, WM ;
HOWERTON, AL .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 9 (04) :410-416
[2]  
Alexander K.A., 2003, SUCCESS FAILURE REAS
[3]  
ALGOZZINE B, 2002, STRATEGIES RACTICS E
[4]   Student Ratings of Stressful Experiences at Home and School: Loss of a Parent and Grade Retention as Superlative Stressors [J].
Anderson, Gabrielle ;
Jimerson, Shane ;
Whipple, Angela .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 21 (01) :1-20
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Journal of Education For Students Placed At-risk
[6]   Are school based mental health services effective? Evidence from 36 inner city schools [J].
Armbruster, P ;
Lichtman, J .
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 1999, 35 (06) :493-504
[7]  
Barnett KP, 1996, PSYCHOL SCHOOLS, V33, P285, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199610)33:4<285::AID-PITS3>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-M
[9]  
BYRNES D, 1989, FLUNKING GRADES RES, V5, P16
[10]  
Byrnes D., 1987, J RES CHILDHOOD ED, V2, P117