CRAFTING INTERACTIVITY FOR STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT: TRANSFORMING ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT COMMUNICATION IN SCIENCE AND POLICY

被引:7
作者
Aakhus, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Commun, Sch Commun & Informat, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2011年 / 101卷 / 05期
关键词
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; International Radiation Protection Association; public information; risk communication;
D O I
10.1097/HP.0b013e318222ede0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The International Radiation Protection Association's guiding principles for stakeholder engagement focus on fostering, facilitating, and enabling interaction among stakeholders that is inclusive and fosters competent decision making. Implicit in these standards is a call to cultivate knowledge and competence in designing communication for stakeholder engagement among radiation protection professionals. Communication as design is an approach to risk communication in science and policy that differs from, yet complements, the more well-known communication practices of informing and persuading. Design focuses on the recurring practical problem faced by professionals in making communication possible among stakeholders where it has otherwise been difficult, impossible, or even unimagined. The knowledge and competence associated with design involves principles for crafting interactivity across a variety of mediated and non-mediated encounters among stakeholders. Risk communication can be improved by cultivating expertise in scalable communication design that embraces the demands of involvement without abandoning the need for competence in science and policy communication. Health Phys. 101(5): 531-535; 2011
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 535
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Aakhus M, 2005, LEA COMMUN SER, P411
  • [2] AAKHUS M, 2009, CONCERNING ARGUMENT, P33
  • [3] Aakhus M., 1999, KNOWLEDGE TECHNOLOGY, V2, P20
  • [4] Communication as design
    Aakhus, Mark
    [J]. COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2007, 74 (01) : 112 - 117
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, Political Communication and Deliberation
  • [6] Argumentation support: From technologies to tools
    De Moor, A
    Aakhus, M
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2006, 49 (03) : 93 - 98
  • [7] FISHER F, 1992, ARGUMENTATIVE TURN P
  • [8] JACKSON S, 2005, ENGAGING ARGUMENT
  • [9] Black box arguments
    Jackson S.
    [J]. Argumentation, 2008, 22 (3) : 437 - 446
  • [10] JACOBS S, 2002, CONFLICT RESOLUTIO Q, V29, P177