Decentralized Sequential Change Detection with Ordered CUSUMs

被引:0
|
作者
Banerjee, Sourabh [1 ,2 ]
Fellouris, Georgios [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Stat, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coordinated Sci Lab, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
来源
2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY | 2016年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We consider the problem of decentralized sequential change detection, in which K sensors monitor a system in real time, and at some unknown time there is an anomaly in the environment that changes the distribution of the observations in all sensors. The sensors communicate with a fusion center that is responsible for quickly detecting the change, while controlling the false alarm rate. We focus on two families of decentralized detection rules with minimal communication requirements. First, we assume that each sensor runs a local CUSUM algorithm and communicates with the fusion center only once, when it detects the change. The fusion center then declares that a change has occurred when m of the K sensors have raised an alarm. Assuming that all sensors have the same signal strength, we show that the asymptotic performance of these one-shot schemes is free of m to a first order, but decreases with m to a second-order, suggesting that the best strategy for the fusion center is to detect the change with the first alarm. Second, we consider schemes that detect the change when m of the K sensors agree simultaneously that the change has occurred. While a first-order asymptotic analysis suggests that it is optimal for the fusion center to wait for all sensors to agree simultaneously, a second-order analysis reveals that it can be better to wait fewer (but more than half) of the sensors to agree. The insights from these asymptotic results are supported by a simulation study.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 40
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Centralized and Decentralized Strategies for Sequential Detection of Transient Changes
    Mana, Fatima Ezzahra
    Guepie, Blaise Kevin
    Nikiforov, Igor
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (06): : 360 - 365
  • [22] A simple on-line algorithm for decentralized sequential detection
    Guo, C
    Kuh, A
    1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY - PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 28 - 28
  • [23] Sequential sparsification for change detection
    Ozay, Necmiye
    Sznaier, Mario
    Camps, Octavia I.
    2008 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOLS 1-12, 2008, : 1014 - 1019
  • [24] Sequential change detection revisited
    Moustakides, George V.
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2008, 36 (02): : 787 - 807
  • [25] Modeling stage-sequential change in ordered categorical responses
    Kim, JS
    Böckenholt, U
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2000, 5 (03) : 380 - 400
  • [26] On optimal quantization rules for some problems in sequential decentralized detection
    Nguyen, XuanLong
    Wainwrigh, Maitin J.
    Jordan, Michael I.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2008, 54 (07) : 3285 - 3295
  • [27] Dynamic Decentralized Sequential Detection Under Uniformly Distributed Observations
    Lee, Ji-Woong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2009, 54 (11) : 2707 - 2714
  • [28] Decentralized Bayesian sequential detection under uniformly distributed observations
    Lee, JW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-4, 2002, : 4772 - 4777
  • [29] Sequential subspace change point detection
    Xie, Liyan
    Xie, Yao
    Moustakides, George, V
    SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS-DESIGN METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 39 (03): : 307 - 335
  • [30] Multisource Bayesian sequential change detection
    Dayanik, Savas
    Poor, H. Vincent
    Sezer, Semih O.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2008, 18 (02): : 552 - 590