Are upwind techniques in multi-phase flow models necessary?

被引:23
作者
Park, C. -H. [1 ,2 ]
Boettcher, N. [3 ]
Wang, W. [2 ]
Kolditz, O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Geosci & Mineral Resources KIGAM, Dept Geothermal Resources, Taejon 305350, South Korea
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Environm Informat, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Groundwater Management, D-01069 Dresden, DE, Germany
关键词
Two-phase flow; Galerkin finite element methods; Upwind schemes; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; POROUS-MEDIA; ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; IMMISCIBLE FLOW; 2-PHASE FLOW; CONTAMINATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcp.2011.07.030
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Two alternatives of primary variables are compared for two-phase flow in heterogeneous media by solving fully established benchmarks. The first combination utilizes pressure of the wetting fluid and saturation of the non-wetting fluid as primary variables, while the second employs capillary pressure of the wetting fluid and pressure of the non-wetting fluid. While the standard Galerkin finite element method (SGFEM) is known to fail in the physical reproduction of two-phase flow in heterogeneous media (unless employing a fully upwind correction), the second scheme with capillary pressure as a primary variable without applying an upwind technique produces correct physical fluid behaviour in heterogeneous media, as observed from experiments. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8304 / 8312
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条