Joint Bayesian Modeling of Binomial and Rank Data for Primate Cognition

被引:6
作者
Barney, Bradley J. [1 ]
Amici, Federica [2 ]
Aureli, Filippo [3 ]
Call, Josep [5 ,6 ]
Johnson, Valen E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Kennesaw State Univ, Dept Stat & Analyt Sci, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
[2] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Dept Dev & Comparat Psychol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Veracruzana, Inst Neuroetol, Xalapa 91000, Veracruz, Mexico
[4] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Res Ctr Evolutionary Anthropol & Palaeoecol, Liverpool L3 5UX, Merseyside, England
[5] Univ St Andrews, Sch Psychol & Neurosci, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[6] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Primate Res Ctr, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Interanimal variability; Latent performance; Mixed response; LATENT VARIABLE MODELS; INTELLIGENCE; BINARY;
D O I
10.1080/01621459.2015.1016223
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
In recent years, substantial effort has been devoted to methods for analyzing data containing mixed response types, but such techniques typically do not include rank data among the response types. Some unique challenges exist in analyzing rank data, particularly when ties are prevalent. We present techniques for jointly modeling binomial and rank data using Bayesian latent variable models. We apply these techniques to compare the cognitive abilities of nonhuman primates based on their performance on 17 cognitive tasks scored on either a rank or binomial scale. To jointly model the rank and binomial responses, we assume that responses are implicitly determined by latent cognitive abilities. We then model the latent variables using random effects models, with identifying restrictions chosen to promote parsimonious prior specification and model inferences. Results from the primate cognitive data are presented to illustrate the methodology. Our results suggest that the ordering of the cognitive abilities of species varies significantly across tasks, suggesting a partially independent evolution of cognitive abilities in primates. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 582
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS OF BINARY AND POLYCHOTOMOUS RESPONSE DATA [J].
ALBERT, JH ;
CHIB, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 88 (422) :669-679
[2]   A Modular Mind? A Test Using Individual Data from Seven Primate Species [J].
Amici, Federica ;
Barney, Bradley ;
Johnson, Valen E. ;
Call, Josep ;
Aureli, Filippo .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12)
[3]   General Intelligence in Another Primate: Individual Differences across Cognitive Task Performance in a New World Monkey (Saguinus oedipus) [J].
Banerjee, Konika ;
Chabris, Christopher F. ;
Johnson, Valen E. ;
Lee, James J. ;
Tsao, Fritz ;
Hauser, Marc D. .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (06)
[4]   Accelerating Monte Carlo Markov chain convergence for cumulative-link generalized linear models [J].
Cowles, MK .
STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 1996, 6 (02) :101-111
[5]   Bayesian latent variable models for clustered mixed outcomes [J].
Dunson, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2000, 62 :355-366
[6]   A bayesian semiparametric latent variable model for mixed responses [J].
Fahrmeir, Ludwig ;
Raach, Alexander .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2007, 72 (03) :327-346
[7]   A SEMIPARAMETRIC APPROACH TO MIXED OUTCOME LATENT VARIABLE MODELS: ESTIMATING THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN COGNITION AND REGIONAL BRAIN VOLUMES [J].
Gruhl, Jonathan ;
Erosheva, Elena A. ;
Crane, Paul K. .
ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2013, 7 (04) :2361-2383
[8]   A correlated probit model for joint modeling of clustered binary and continuous responses [J].
Gueorguieva, RV ;
Agresti, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 96 (455) :1102-1112
[9]   EXTENDING THE RANK LIKELIHOOD FOR SEMIPARAMETRIC COPULA ESTIMATION [J].
Hoff, Peter D. .
ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2007, 1 (01) :265-283
[10]   On the use of non-local prior densities in Bayesian hypothesis tests [J].
Johnson, Valen E. ;
Rossell, David .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2010, 72 :143-170