Spinal cord stimulation treatment for angina pectoris: More than a placebo?

被引:6
|
作者
Gersbach, PA
Hasdemir, MG
Eeckhout, E
von Segesser, LK
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Neurosurg, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Lausanne Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Univ Lausanne Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Lausanne, Switzerland
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2001年 / 72卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02950-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. The effects of thoracolumbal spinal cord stimulation (SCS) are confined to restricted microcirculatory areas. This limitation is generally attributed to a predominantly segmental mode of action on the autonomic nervous system. The goal of this study was to determine whether SCS applied close to supraspinal autonomic centers would induce generalized hemodynamic changes that could explain its alleged antianginal properties. Methods. Invasive hemodynamic tests were performed in 15 anesthetized Gottingen minipigs submitted to iterative cervical SCS of various duration and intensity. Results. Hemodynamic changes exceeding 10% were observed in 59 of 68 SCS sessions (87%). Their extent and time to peak varied with SCS intensity. At 2, 5, and 10 V, significant, (t test p < 0.05) peak changes occurred in cardiac output (+34%, +29%, and +28%, respectively), stroke volume (+19%, +16%, +15%), mean pressure (+9%, +27%, +40%), heart rate (+14%, +23%, +14%), systemic (-17%, NS, NS), and pulmonary vascular (25%, NS, NS) resistances. Strikingly, at 2 V, the increase in cardiac output (+34%) was higher than the synchronous rise in rate pressure product (+22%), indicating efficient cardiac work. At 10 V, however, the cardiac work was inefficient (rate pressure product + 53%/cardiac output + 28%). Conclusions. Low-voltage cervical neuromodulation reduces the postcharge and improves cardiac work efficiency. The resulting reduction in oxygen myocardial demand may account for decreased anginal pain. (C) 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:S1100 / S1104
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of angina pectoris
    Aronow W.S.
    Frishman W.H.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2004, 6 (1) : 79 - 83
  • [2] Spinal cord stimulation as a pain treatment for angina pectoris
    Andersen, C
    Hole, P
    Oxhoj, H
    PAIN CLINIC, 1996, 8 (04): : 333 - 339
  • [3] Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris
    Osenbach, RK
    Haines, SJ
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 9 (06) : 394 - 406
  • [4] Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris
    Tykocki, Tomasz
    Guzek, Krystyna
    Mandat, Tomasz
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2011, 69 (04) : 383 - 387
  • [5] Cervical spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of severe angina pectoris
    González-Darder, JM
    González-Martínez, V
    Canela-Moya, P
    NEUROSURGERY QUARTERLY, 1998, 8 (01) : 16 - 23
  • [6] Treatment of intractable angina pectoris utilizing spinal cord stimulation
    Mesa, Juan E.
    Yakovlev, Alexander E.
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (01) : 70 - 74
  • [7] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris
    Lee, Seong Heon
    Jeong, Hye Jin
    Jeong, Sin Ho
    Lee, Hyung Gon
    Choi, Jeong Il
    Yoon, Myung Ha
    Kim, Woong Mo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 25 (02): : 121 - 125
  • [8] Unstable angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation
    Akbas, Mert
    Yegin, Arif
    Yilmaz, Huseyin
    Altekin, R. Emre
    Sabit, Muhammed Jamil
    Sanli, Suat
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2015, 19 (03) : 383 - 385
  • [9] Spinal cord stimulation for intractable angina pectoris
    Fanciullo, GJ
    Robb, JF
    Rose, RJ
    Sanders, JH
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (02): : 305 - 306
  • [10] Angina pectoris treated with spinal cord stimulation
    Andersen, C
    DANISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 43 (02): : 188 - 189