Development of an Empirically Based Learning Performances Framework for Third-Grade Students' Model-Based Explanations About Plant Processes

被引:21
作者
Zangori, Laura [1 ]
Forbes, Cory T. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Learning Teaching & Curriculum, Coll Educ, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Sch Nat Resources, Coll Educ & Human Sci, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Teaching Learning & Teacher Educ, Coll Educ & Human Sci, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
关键词
SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1002/sce.21238
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
To develop scientific literacy, elementary students should engage in knowledge building of core concepts through scientific practice (Duschl, Schweingruber, & Schouse, 2007). A core scientific practice is engagement in scientific modeling to build conceptual understanding about discipline-specific concepts. Yet scientific modeling remains underemphasized in elementary science learning environments, and little past research has explored early learners' engagement in domain-specific modeling practices. Here we report on a design-based study to investigate the ways in which third-grade students generate model-based explanations about two core plant growth and development processes: plant structure/function and plant life cycles. First, using design-based research, we developed and empirically tested a learning performance framework that integrates discipline-specific content with scientific practice to examine third-grade students' engagement in epistemic features of model-based explanations about plant growth and development. Next, we used the learning performance framework as a rubric to measure third-grade students mechanism-based scientific explanations generated from the models they developed prior to and after a long-term plant curriculum enactment. Findings from the learning performance highlight that students hold conceptual resources about plant processes and use this knowledge to reason in sophisticated ways. However, our findings from the pre/postmodels suggest that when students do not have opportunities to build conceptual knowledge, they depend on anthropomorphic analogies to reason about plant processes. Study findings imply that third-grade students require more sophisticated opportunities in building knowledge about how and why plant processes occur so they can use this knowledge to scientifically reason about how and why plants grow, develop, and survive. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 982
页数:22
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Modeling as a teaching learning process for understanding materials:: A case study in primary education [J].
Acher, Andres ;
Arca, Maria ;
Sanmarti, Neus .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2007, 91 (03) :398-418
[2]  
[Anonymous], ATL SCI LIT
[3]  
Barman CR, 2006, AM BIOL TEACH, V68, P73, DOI 10.1662/0002-7685(2006)068[0073:SIAPPG]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Explanation: a mechanist alternative [J].
Bechtel, William ;
Abrahamsen, Adele .
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES, 2005, 36 (02) :421-441
[6]  
Berland L.K., 2015, Journal of Research in Science Teaching
[7]  
Brown J. S., 1989, Educational Researcher, V18, P32, DOI [https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032, DOI 10.2307/1176008]
[8]  
Coll RK, 2011, MODEL MODEL SCI EDUC, V6, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0449-7_1
[9]  
Duschl R. A., 2007, TAKING SCI SCH LEARN
[10]   Empirical Validation of Integrated Learning Performances for Hydrologic Phenomena: 3rd-Grade Students' Model-Driven Explanation-Construction [J].
Forbes, Cory T. ;
Zangori, Laura ;
Schwarz, Christina V. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2015, 52 (07) :895-921