The consequences of cobenefits for the efficient design of carbon sequestration programs

被引:14
作者
Feng, HL [1 ]
Kling, CL [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Div CARD, Dept Econ & Head Resource & Environm Policy, Ames, IA 50011 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE | 2005年 / 53卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00030.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
In this paper, we study the social efficiency of private carbon markets that include trading in agricultural soil carbon sequestration when there art? significant cobenefits (positive environmental externalities) associated with the practices that sequester carbon. Likewise, we investigate the efficiency of government run conservation programs that are designed to promote a broad array of environmental attributes (both carbon sequestration and its cobenefits) for the supply of carbon. Finally, policy design and efficiency issues associated with the potential interplay between a private carbon market and a government conservation program are studied. Empirical analyses for an area that represents a significant potential source of carbon sequestration and its associated cobenefits illustrate the magnitude and complexity of these issues in real world policy design.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 476
页数:16
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, POTENTIAL US GRAZING
[2]   Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector [J].
Burtraw, D ;
Krupnick, A ;
Palmer, K ;
Paul, A ;
Toman, M ;
Bloyd, C .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (03) :650-673
[3]  
Ekins P, 2001, J ECON SURV, V15, P325
[4]  
FENG H, 2004, 04WP365 IOW STAT U C
[5]   The dynamics of carbon sequestration and alternative carbon accounting, with an application to the upper Mississippi River Basin [J].
Feng, HL .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 54 (01) :23-35
[6]  
*IOW FARM BUR, 2005, CARB CRED AGGR PIL P
[7]  
Lal R., 1998, POTENTIAL US CROPLAN
[8]   Climate change - Greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry [J].
McCarl, BA ;
Schneider, UA .
SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5551) :2481-2482
[9]  
McGill W. B., 2005, MODELING SOIL ORGANI
[10]   Co-benefits from carbon sequestration in forests: Evaluating reductions in agricultural externalities from an afforestation policy in Wisconsin [J].
Plantinga, AJ ;
Wu, JJ .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (01) :74-85