Comparing single-station 6C measurements and array measurements for seismic microzonation in Munich, Germany

被引:4
作者
Keil, Sabrina [1 ]
Wilczek, Alexander [2 ]
Wassermann, Joachim [1 ]
Kremers, Simon [2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilian Univ Munich, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Geophys, D-8033 Munich, Germany
[2] DMT GmbH & Co KG, Body Vibrat Measurements, D-45307 Essen, Germany
关键词
Joint inversion; Rotational seismology; Seismic noise; Site effects; Surface waves and free oscillations; RAYLEIGH-WAVE ELLIPTICITY; SITE RESPONSE; GROUND-MOTION; ROTATION RATE; INVERSION; VELOCITY;
D O I
10.1093/gji/ggac273
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The essential goal of seismic microzonation is the estimation of the shallow velocity structure in order to characterize the local earthquake shaking characteristics. This is of special importance in densely inhabited areas with unfavourable soil conditions. The common approach is the analysis of ambient noise array data using frequency-wavenumber (FK) or spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) techniques. However, the installation of arrays is difficult, especially within urban environments, making single-station approaches more desirable. In this study, we directly compare the recently developed approach of velocity estimation using single-station six-component (6C) measurements, combining three translational and three rotational motions, with the established methods of FK and SPAC analysis. We conduct measurements in Munich's inner city using a geophone array and an iXblue blueSeis-3A rotational motion sensor together with a Nanometrics Trillium Compact Seismometer, respectively. From the array data, as well as from the 6C data, Love and Rayleigh dispersion curves are estimated and further inverted for 1-D P- and S-wave velocity profiles. We find that all methods give similar results, indicating the potential of the novel 6C approach. Furthermore, adding horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios enables the inversion for structures at greater depth and increases the resolution of the velocity structure. In addition, we test different array geometries to evaluate the influence of the sensor configuration on the results. As a last step, we compare the estimated velocity models to lithologic profiles and find an overall positive correlation, which supports our inversion results.
引用
收藏
页码:1634 / 1652
页数:19
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Aki K., 1957, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., V35, P415, DOI DOI 10.15083/0000033938
[2]  
ALLEN NF, 1980, J GEOTECH ENG-ASCE, V106, P235
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNI
[4]   S-wave velocity profiling by joint inversion of microtremor dispersion curve and horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) spectrum [J].
Arai, H ;
Tokimatsu, K .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 95 (05) :1766-1778
[5]   ARRAY ESTIMATORS AND THE USE OF MICROSEISMS FOR RECONNAISSANCE OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS [J].
ASTEN, MW ;
HENSTRIDGE, JD .
GEOPHYSICS, 1984, 49 (11) :1828-1837
[6]   BlueSeis3A: Full Characterization of a 3C Broadband Rotational Seismometer [J].
Bernauer, Felix ;
Wassermann, Joachim ;
Guattari, Frederic ;
Frenois, Arnaud ;
Bigueur, Alexandre ;
Gaillot, Arnaud ;
de Toldi, Elliot ;
Ponceau, Damien ;
Schreiber, Ulrich ;
Igel, Heiner .
SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 89 (02) :620-629
[7]  
Bettig B., 2001, Bollettino de Geofisica Teoria e Applicata, V42, P281
[8]   Ground motion in Anchorage, Alaska, from the 2002 Denali fault earthquake: Site response and displacement pulses [J].
Boore, DM .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 94 (06) :S72-S84
[9]  
Borcherdt R.D., 2012, PAPER ID WCEE2012 01
[10]   Rotaphone, a mechanical seismic sensor system for field rotation rate measurements and its in situ calibration [J].
Brokesova, Johana ;
Malek, Jiri ;
Kolinsky, Petr .
JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2012, 16 (04) :603-621