Detection of colorectal hepatic metastases using MnDPDP MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) alone and in combination

被引:116
作者
Koh, D. M. [1 ,2 ]
Brown, G. [1 ]
Riddell, A. M. [1 ]
Scurr, E. [1 ]
Collins, D. J. [2 ]
Allen, S. D. [1 ]
Chau, I. [3 ]
Cunningham, D. [3 ]
deSouza, N. M. [2 ]
Leach, M. O. [2 ]
Husband, J. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Acad Dept Radiol, Sutton, Surrey, England
[2] Inst Canc Res, UK Clin Magnet Resonance Res Grp, Sutton, Surrey, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Sutton, Surrey, England
关键词
liver; metastases; diffusion-weighted imaging; MR imaging; colorectal;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-007-0847-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of MnDPDP MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), alone and in combination, for detecting colorectal liver metastases in patients with suspected metastatic disease. Thirty-three consecutive patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases underwent MR imaging. Three image sets (MnDPDP, DWI and combined MnDPDP and DWI) were reviewed independently by two observers. Lesions were scored on a five-point scale for malignancy and the areas (Az) under the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for each observer and image set. The sensitivity and specificity for lesion detection were calculated for each image set and compared. There were 83 metastases, 49 cysts and 1 haemangioma. Using the combined set resulted in the highest diagnostic accuracy for both observers (Az=0.94 and 0.96), with improved averaged sensitivity of lesion detection compared with the DWI set (p=0.01), and a trend towards improved sensitivity compared with the MnDPDP set (p=0.06). There was no difference in the averaged specificity using any of the three image sets (p > 0.5). Combination of MnDPDP MR imaging and DWI resulted in the highest diagnostic accuracy and can increase sensitivity without loss in specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 910
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Detection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective multicenter trial comparing unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT [J].
Bartolozzi, C ;
Donati, F ;
Cioni, D ;
Procacci, C ;
Morana, G ;
Chiesa, A ;
Grazioli, L ;
Cittadini, G ;
Cittadini, G ;
Giovagnoni, A ;
Gandini, G ;
Maass, J ;
Lencioni, R .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) :14-20
[2]  
Beziat C, 2004, J RADIOL, V85, P307
[3]   Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis - Meta-analysis [J].
Bipat, S ;
van Leeuwen, MS ;
Comans, EFI ;
Pijl, MEJ ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
Zwinderman, AH ;
Stoker, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (01) :123-131
[4]   Survival after resection of multiple bilobar hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma [J].
Bolton, JS ;
Fuhrman, GM .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (05) :743-750
[5]  
Brand MI, 2000, AM SURGEON, V66, P412
[6]   Detection of hepatic metastasis: Manganese- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MR imaging [J].
Choi, Jin-Young ;
Kim, Myeong-Jin ;
Kim, Joo Hee ;
Kim, Seung Hyoung ;
Ko, Heung-Kyu ;
Lim, Joon Seok ;
Oh, Young Taik ;
Chung, Jae-Joon ;
Yoo, Hyung Sik ;
Lee, Jong Tae ;
Kim, Ki Whang .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 60 (01) :84-90
[7]   Comparison of biphasic spiral CT and MnDPDP-enhanced MRI to detect and classify liver lesions. [J].
Grimm, J ;
Müller-Hülsbeck, S ;
Blume, J ;
Biederer, J ;
Heller, M .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2001, 173 (03) :266-272
[8]  
Kane PA, 1997, ACTA RADIOL, V38, P650
[9]   Small (≤ 2 cm) hepatic lesions in colorectal cancer patients:: Detection and characterization on mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MRI [J].
Kim, KW ;
Kim, AY ;
Kim, TK ;
Park, SH ;
Kim, HJ ;
Lee, YK ;
Park, MS ;
Ha, HK ;
Kim, PN ;
Kim, JC ;
Lee, MG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (05) :1233-1240
[10]   Evaluation of super paramagnetic iron oxide-enhanced diffusion-weighted PROPELLER T2-fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging - Preliminary experience [J].
Kiryu, S ;
Watanabe, M ;
Kabasawa, H ;
Akahane, M ;
Aoki, S ;
Ohtomo, K .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2006, 30 (02) :197-200