Minimum Clinically Important Difference in SF-36 Scores for Use in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

被引:70
作者
Badhiwala, Jetan H. [1 ]
Witiw, Christopher D. [1 ]
Nassiri, Farshad [1 ]
Akbar, Muhammad A. [1 ]
Jaja, Blessing [1 ]
Wilson, Jefferson R. [1 ]
Fehlings, Michael G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
cervical spine; cervical spondylotic myelopathy; degenerative cervical myelopathy; minimum clinically important difference; psychometric properties; quality of life short form-36; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY; INTRAINDIVIDUAL CHANGES; SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION; DISABILITY INDEX; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002684
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Post-hoc analysis of 606 patients enrolled in the AOSpine CSM-NA or CSM-I prospective, multicenter cohort studies. Objective. The aim of this study was to determine the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Summary of Background Data. There has been a shift toward focus on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in spine surgery. However, the numerical scores of PROs lack immediate clinical meaning. The MCID adds a dimension of interpretability to PRO scales; by defining the smallest change, a patient would consider meaningful. Methods. The MCID of the SF-36v2 PCS and MCS were determined by distribution-and anchor-based methods comparing preoperative to 12-month scores. Distribution-based approaches included calculation of the half standard deviation and standard error of measurement (SEM). Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) served as the anchor: "worse'' (Delta NDI> 7.5); "unchanged'' (7.5 >=Delta DNDI> 7.5); "slightly improved'' (-7.5 >=Delta NDI>-15); and "markedly improved'' (Delta NDI <=-15). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the change score for the MCID with even sensitivity and specificity to distinguish patients who were "slightly improved'' versus "unchanged'' on the NDI. Results. The MCID for the SF-36v2 PCS and MCS were 4.6 and 6.8 by half standard deviation and 2.9 and 4.3 by SEM, respectively. By ROC analysis, the MCID was 3.9 for the SF-36v2 PCS score and 3.2 for the SF-36v2 MCS score. Using a cutoff of 4 points, the SF-36v2 PCS had a sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 68.1%, and MCS 61.9% and 64.6%, respectively, in separating patients who were "markedly improved'' or "slightly improved'' from those who were "unchanged'' or "worse.'' Conclusion. We found the MCID of the SF-36v2 PCS and MCS to be 4 points. This will facilitate use of the SF-36v2 as an outcome in future studies of DCM.
引用
收藏
页码:E1260 / E1266
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Measuring Surgical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Assessment of Minimum Clinically Important Difference [J].
Auffinger, Brenda M. ;
Lall, Rishi R. ;
Dahdaleh, Nader S. ;
Wong, Albert P. ;
Lam, Sandi K. ;
Koski, Tyler ;
Fessler, Richard G. ;
Smith, Zachary A. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06)
[2]   CERVICAL LAMINECTOMY AND DENTATE LIGAMENT SECTION FOR CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY [J].
BENZEL, EC ;
LANCON, J ;
KESTERSON, L ;
HADDEN, T .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1991, 4 (03) :286-295
[3]   Can the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Become Relevant to Controlling Medical Costs and Improving Value? [J].
Brook, Robert H. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 306 (18) :2020-2021
[4]   Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion [J].
Carreon, Leah Y. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Campbell, Mitchell J. ;
Anderson, Paul A. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (06) :469-474
[5]  
Committee on Quality Health Care in America IoM, CROSSING QUALITY CHA
[6]   Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Berven, Sigurd ;
Schuler, Thomas C. ;
Carreon, Leah Y. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (06) :968-974
[7]   A Global Perspective on the Outcomes of Surgical Decompression in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy [J].
Fehlings, Michael G. ;
Ibrahim, Ahmed ;
Tetreault, Lindsay ;
Albanese, Vincenzo ;
Alvarado, Manuel ;
Arnold, Paul ;
Barbagallo, Giuseppe ;
Bartels, Ronald ;
Bolger, Ciaran ;
Defino, Helton ;
Kale, Shashank ;
Massicotte, Eric ;
Moraes, Osmar ;
Scerrati, Massimo ;
Tan, Gamaliel ;
Tanaka, Masato ;
Toyone, Tomoaki ;
Yukawa, Yasutsugu ;
Zhou, Qiang ;
Zileli, Mehmet ;
Kopjar, Branko .
SPINE, 2015, 40 (17) :1322-1328
[8]   Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Decompression in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Results of the AOSpine North America Prospective Multi-Center Study [J].
Fehlings, Michael G. ;
Wilson, Jefferson R. ;
Kopjar, Branko ;
Yoon, Sangwook Tim ;
Arnold, Paul M. ;
Massicotte, Eric M. ;
Vaccaro, Alexander R. ;
Brodke, Darrel S. ;
Shaffrey, Christopher I. ;
Smith, Justin S. ;
Woodard, Eric J. ;
Banco, Robert J. ;
Chapman, Jens R. ;
Janssen, Michael E. ;
Bono, Christopher M. ;
Sasso, Rick C. ;
Dekutoski, Mark B. ;
Gokaslan, Ziya L. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (18) :1651-1658
[9]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[10]   Distribution-based and anchor-based approaches provided different interpretability estimates for the Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire [J].
Kulkarni, AV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (02) :176-184