Lottery-Based versus Fixed Incentives to Increase Clinicians' Response to Surveys

被引:46
作者
Halpern, Scott D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kohn, Rachel [4 ]
Dornbrand-Lo, Aaron [3 ]
Metkus, Thomas [5 ]
Asch, David A. [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Volpp, Kevin G. [2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Ctr Hlth Incent, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Bioeth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Philadelphia VA Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Incentives; response rate; surveys; lottery; behavioral economics; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MAIL SURVEYS; PHYSICIAN RESPONSE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; RATES; CASH; QUESTIONNAIRES; 5-DOLLAR; PAY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01264.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To compare the effects of lottery-based and fixed incentives on clinicians' response to surveys. Data Sources. Three randomized trials with fixed payments and actuarially equivalent lotteries. Study Design. Trial 1 compared a low-probability/high-payout lottery, a high-probability/low-payout lottery, and no incentive. Trial 2 compared a moderate-probability/moderate-payout lottery with an unconditional fixed payment (payment sent with questionnaire). Trial 3 compared a moderate-probability/moderate-payout lottery with a conditional fixed payment (payment promised following response). Principal Findings. Neither the low-probability nor high-probability lotteries improved response compared with no incentive. Unconditional fixed payments produced significantly greater response than actuarially equivalent lotteries, but conditional fixed payments did not. Conclusions. Lottery-based incentives do not improve clinicians' response rates compared with no incentives, and they are inferior to unconditional fixed payments.
引用
收藏
页码:1663 / 1674
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2016, STAND DEF FIN DISP C
[2]  
[Anonymous], ECONOMETRICA
[3]   Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget - A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives [J].
Asch, DA ;
Christakis, NA ;
Ubel, PA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :95-99
[4]   Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals [J].
Asch, DA ;
Jedrziewski, MK ;
Christakis, NA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) :1129-1136
[5]   DIFFERENT RESPONSE RATES IN A TRIAL OF 2 ENVELOPE STYLES IN MAIL SURVEY-RESEARCH [J].
ASCH, DA ;
CHRISTAKIS, NA .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) :364-365
[6]   Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey [J].
Baron, G ;
De Wals, P ;
Milord, F .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2001, 24 (01) :47-52
[7]   PHYSICIAN RESPONSE TO A MAILED SURVEY - AN EXPERIMENT IN TIMING OF PAYMENT [J].
BERRY, SH ;
KANOUSE, DE .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1987, 51 (01) :102-114
[8]  
Choi B C, 1990, Epidemiology, V1, P72, DOI 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00015
[9]  
Cummings SM, 2001, HEALTH SERV RES, V35, P1347
[10]   Psychological foundations of incentives [J].
Fehr, E ;
Falk, A .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 46 (4-5) :687-724