Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy

被引:135
作者
Kim, DI [1 ]
Kim, MH [1 ]
Lee, SK [1 ]
Seo, DW [1 ]
Chol, WB [1 ]
Lee, SS [1 ]
Park, HJ [1 ]
Joo, YH [1 ]
Yoo, KS [1 ]
Kim, HJ [1 ]
Min, YI [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2001.115335
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EST) is a well-established procedure for bile duct stone extraction. Bile duct stones can be classified as primary or secondary. However, few data are available on the recurrence of primary and secondary bile duct stones after EST. Therefore risk factors for the recurrence of primary bile duct stones after EST were prospectively studied, Methods: Between 1991 and 1997, 61 patients underwent EST far primary bile duct stones. All met the following criteria: (1) previous cholecystectomy without bile duct exploration, (2) detection of bile duct stones at least 2 years after initial cholecystectomy, Mean follow-up was 2.2 years. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up. The recurrence of primary bile duct stones was defined as the detection of bile duct stones no sooner than 6 months after complete clearance of primary bile duct stones. Results: The overall recurrence rate of primary bile duct stones was 21% (10 of 47). Two significant risk factors for recurrence were identified by multivariate analysis: (1) patients with a bile duct diameter of 13 mm or greater after stone removal had recurrences more frequently than those with a duct diameter of 13 mm or less, and (2) patients whose papilla was located on the inner rim or deep within a diverticulum, so that the papillary orifice was not visible endoscopically, had more frequent recurrences than patients with a papilla outside the diverticulum, or no peripapillary diverticulum. Conclusion: The independent risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones were sustained dilation of the bile duct even after complete removal of stones and location of the papilla on the inner rim or deep within a diverticulum.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 48
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   MANAGEMENT OF RECURRENT AND RESIDUAL COMMON DUCT STONES [J].
ALLEN, B ;
SHAPIRO, H ;
WAY, LW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 142 (01) :41-47
[2]   Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age [J].
Bergman, JJGHM ;
vanderMey, S ;
Rauws, EAJ ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Gouma, DJ ;
Tytgat, GNJ ;
Huibregtse, K .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (06) :643-649
[3]  
CELIA F, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P329
[4]   An analysis of the relationship between bile duct stones and periampullary duodenal diverticula [J].
Chandy, G ;
Hart, WJ ;
RobertsThomson, IC .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 1997, 12 (01) :29-33
[5]   Therapeutic biliary endoscopy [J].
Choudari, CP ;
Fogel, E ;
Gottlieb, K ;
Sherman, S ;
Lehman, GA .
ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 30 (02) :163-173
[6]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY OF PAPILLA OF VATER AND EXTRACTION OF STONES FROM CHOLEDOCHAL DUCT [J].
CLASSEN, M ;
DEMLING, L .
DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1974, 99 (11) :496-497
[7]   Endoscopic sphincterotomy for stones by experts is safe, even in younger patients with normal ducts [J].
Cotton, PB ;
Geenen, JE ;
Sherman, S ;
Cunningham, JT ;
Howell, DA ;
Carr-Locke, DL ;
Nickl, NJ ;
Hawes, RH ;
Lehman, GA ;
Ferrari, A ;
Slivka, A ;
Lichtenstein, DR ;
Baillie, J ;
Jowell, PS ;
Lail, LM ;
Evangelou, H ;
Bosco, JJ ;
Hanson, BL ;
Hoffman, BJ ;
Rahaman, SM ;
Male, R .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (02) :201-204
[8]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS [J].
COTTON, PB ;
LEHMAN, G ;
VENNES, J ;
GEENEN, JE ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
MEYERS, WC ;
LIGUORY, C ;
NICKL, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) :383-393
[9]  
COTTON PB, 1994, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V89, P169
[10]  
DENBESTEN L, 1987, SURGERY GALLBLADDER, P283