Investigations of effect of phase change mass transfer rate on cavitation process with homogeneous relaxation model

被引:9
作者
He, Zhixia [1 ]
Zhang, Liang [1 ,3 ]
Saha, Kaushik [2 ]
Som, Sibendu [2 ]
Duan, Lian [1 ]
Wang, Qian [3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Inst Energy Res, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[2] Argonne Natl Lab, Div Energy Syst, 9700 S Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
[3] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Injector nozzle; Cavitation; Mass transfer rate; Homogenous relaxation model; DIESEL; FLOW; NOZZLE; LES;
D O I
10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.09.021
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The super high fuel injection pressure and micro size of nozzle orifice has been an important development trend for the fuel injection system. Accordingly, cavitation transient process, fuel compressibility, amount of non-condensable gas in the fuel and cavitation erosion have attracted more attention. Based on the fact of cavitation in itself is a kind of thermodynamic phase change process, this paper takes the perspective of the cavitation phase change mass transfer process to analyze above mentioned phenomenon. The two-phase cavitating turbulent flow simulations with VOF approach coupled with HRM cavitation model and U-RANS of standard k-epsilon turbulence model were performed for investigations of cavitation phase change mass transfer process. It is concluded the mass transfer time scale coefficient in the Homogenous Relaxation Model (HRM) representing mass transfer rate should tend to be as small as possible in a condition that ensured the solver stable. At very fast mass transfer rate, the phase change occurs at very thin interface between liquid and vapor phase and condensation occurs more focused and then will contribute predictably to a more serious cavitation erosion. Both the initial non-condensable gas in fuel and the fuel compressibility can accelerate the cavitation mass transfer process.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 107
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Alajbegovic A., 1999, P 2 ANN M I MULT SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SAE INT J ENG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CAVITATION BUBBLE DY, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107338760
[4]  
Arai M., 1994, INT S ADV SPRAY COMB, P6
[5]  
Arcoumanis C., 2000, 2000011249 SAE
[6]  
Arcoumanis C, 1999, 1999010524 SAE
[7]   EFFECTS OF NONCONDENSABLE GAS ON CAVITATING NOZZLES [J].
Battistoni, Michele ;
Duke, Daniel J. ;
Swantek, Andrew B. ;
Tilocco, F. Zak ;
Powell, Christopher F. ;
Som, Sibendu .
ATOMIZATION AND SPRAYS, 2015, 25 (06) :453-483
[8]   Comparison of Mixture and Multifluid Models for In-Nozzle Cavitation Prediction [J].
Battistoni, Michele ;
Som, Sibendu ;
Longman, Douglas E. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (06)
[9]  
Bergwerk W., 1959, P I MECH ENG H, V173
[10]   PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF THE RELAXATION MODEL IN 2-PHASE FLOW [J].
BILICKI, Z ;
KESTIN, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1990, 428 (1875) :379-397