Assessment of dynamic increase factor for progressive collapse analysis of RC structures

被引:42
作者
Amiri, Setareh [1 ]
Saffari, Hamed [1 ]
Mashhadi, Javad [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Bahonar Univ Kerman, Dept Civil Engn, Fac Engn, 22 Bahman Blvd,POB 76175-133, Kerman, Iran
关键词
Progressive collapse; Alternate load path; Nonlinear static analysis; Dynamic increase factor; RC structures; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.11.011
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Assessment of a building vulnerability against progressive collapse using Nonlinear Dynamic (NLD) analysis has greater accuracy compared to other methods. Yet, the relevant standards and design guidelines allows the use of Linear Static (LS) analysis and Nonlinear Static (NLS) analysis to assess the progressive collapse risks of buildings. To approximately account for the dynamic effects due to sudden element removal, two different dynamic amplification factors namely, the Load Increase Factor (LIF) and the Dynamic Increase Factor (DIF) in linear and nonlinear static analyses, respectively are suggested. The DIF formulation of the current design guidelines of progressive collapse is relied on the material properties of the affected structural members. In this study, the effect of available structural capacity on DIF value in the Reinforced Concrete (RC) structures is investigated and on this basis a new empirical DIF formula is proposed. For this purpose, several three-dimensional RC building structures with different span lengths and number of stories are designed that have different levels of seismic resistance and implemented to derive the new DIF empirical formula. One of the advantages of the proposed formulae is the possibility of predicting stress and deformation in the RC structures' members after column removal.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 310
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
American Society of Civil Engineers, 2013, 4113 ASCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 31814 ACI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Prentice-hall International Series in Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 710 ASCE
[5]   Improving the accuracy of progressive collapse risk assessment: Efficiency and contribution of supplementary progressive collapse resisting mechanisms [J].
Botez, M. ;
Bredean, L. ;
Ioani, A. M. .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2016, 174 :54-65
[6]   Study of the progressive collapse mechanism of excavations retained by cantilever contiguous piles [J].
Cheng, X. S. ;
Zheng, G. ;
Diao, Y. ;
Huang, T. M. ;
Deng, C. H. ;
Lei, Y. W. ;
Zhou, H. Z. .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2017, 71 :72-89
[7]  
DOD (Department of Defense), 2016, DES BUILD RES PROGR
[8]   Progressive collapse evaluation of externally mitigated reinforced concrete beams [J].
Elkoly, Said ;
El-Ariss, Bilal .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2014, 40 :33-47
[9]   Robustness assessment approaches for steel framed structures under catastrophic events [J].
Formisano, A. ;
Landolfo, R. ;
Mazzolani, F. M. .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2015, 147 :216-228
[10]   Beam element formulation and solution procedure for dynamic progressive collapse analysis [J].
Kaewkulchai, G ;
Williamson, EB .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2004, 82 (7-8) :639-651