Repeatability of 18F-FDG Uptake Measurements in Tumors: A Metaanalysis

被引:137
作者
de Langen, Adrianus J. [1 ]
Vincent, Andrew [2 ]
Velasquez, Linda M. [3 ]
van Tinteren, Harm [2 ]
Boellaard, Ronald [4 ,5 ]
Shankar, Lalitha K. [6 ]
Boers, Maarten [7 ]
Smit, Egbert F. [1 ]
Stroobants, Sigrid [8 ]
Weber, Wolfgang A. [9 ]
Hoekstra, Otto S. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Pulm Dis, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, PET Res, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] NCI, Canc Imaging Program, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[7] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Hosp Antwerpen, Dept Nucl Med, Antwerp, Belgium
[9] Univ Freiburg Klinikum, Nukl Med Klin, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
F-18-FDG; PET; repeatability; cancer; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; ROI DEFINITION; RESPONSE ASSESSMENT; THERAPY RESPONSE; UPTAKE VALUES; LUNG-CANCER; FDG-PET; REPRODUCIBILITY; RECONSTRUCTION; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.111.095299
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PET with the glucose analog F-18-FDG is increasingly used to monitor tumor response to therapy. To use quantitative measurements of tumor F-18-FDG uptake for assessment of tumor response, the repeatability of this quantitative metabolic imaging method needs to be established. Therefore, we determined the repeatability of different standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements using the available data. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies addressing F-18-FDG repeatability in malignant tumors. The level of agreement between test and retest values of 2 PET uptake measures, maximum SUV (SUVmax) and mean SUV (SUVmean), was assessed with the coefficient of repeatability using generalized linear mixed-effects models. In addition, the influence of tumor volume on repeatability was assessed. Principal component transformation was used to compare the reproducibility of the 2 different uptake measures. Results: Five cohorts were identified for this metaanalysis. For SUVmax and SUVmean, datasets of 86 and 102 patients, respectively, were available. Percentage repeatability is a function of the level of uptake. SUVmean had the best repeatability characteristics; for serial PET scans, a threshold of a combination of 20% as well as 1.2 SUVmean units was most appropriate. After adjusting for uptake rate, tumor volume had minimal influence on repeatability. Conclusion: SUVmean had better repeatability performance than SUVmax. Both measures showed poor repeatability for lesions with low F-18-FDG uptake. We recommend the evaluation of biologic effects in PET by reporting a combination of minimal relative and absolute changes to account for test retest variability.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 708
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Response to Therapy in Breast Cancer [J].
Avril, Norbert ;
Sassen, Stefanie ;
Roylance, Rebecca .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 :55S-63S
[2]  
Boellaard R, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P1519
[3]   Effects of Image Characteristics on Performance of Tumor Delineation Methods: A Test-Retest Assessment [J].
Cheebsumon, Patsuree ;
van Velden, Floris H. P. ;
Yaqub, Maqsood ;
Frings, Virginie ;
de Langen, Adrianus J. ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
Lammertsma, Adriaan A. ;
Boellaard, Ronald .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52 (10) :1550-1558
[4]  
Daly LE., 2000, Interpretation and Uses of Medical Statistics, V5th
[5]   Monitoring and Predicting Response to Therapy with 18F-FDG PET in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review [J].
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee ;
Vriens, Dennis ;
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. ;
van der Graaf, Winette T. A. ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 :43S-54S
[6]   Use of H215O-PET and DCE-MRI to measure tumor blood flow [J].
De langen, Adrianus J. ;
van den Boogaart, Vivian E. M. ;
Marcus, J. Tim ;
Lubberink, Mark .
ONCOLOGIST, 2008, 13 (06) :631-644
[7]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[8]   Monitoring Response to Therapeutic Interventions in Patients With Cancer [J].
Herrmann, Ken ;
Krause, Bernd Joachim ;
Bundschuh, Ralph A. ;
Dechow, Tobias ;
Schwaiger, Markus .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 39 (03) :210-232
[9]   Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessment of Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Hicks, Rodney J. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 :31S-42S
[10]  
Hoekstra CJ, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1304