Use of the Telephone-Administered Minnesota Cognitive Acuity Screen to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment

被引:22
作者
Tremont, Geoffrey [1 ,2 ]
Papandonatos, George D. [3 ]
Springate, Beth [2 ]
Huminski, Brooke
McQuiggan, Michael D.
Grace, Janet [2 ,4 ]
Frakey, Laura [2 ,4 ]
Ott, Brian R. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Rhode Isl Hosp, Neuropsychol Program, Dept Psychiat, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Dept Biostat, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[4] Rhode Isl Hosp, Mem Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[5] Brown Univ, Dept Neurol, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[6] Rhode Isl Hosp, Dept Neurol, Providence, RI 02903 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND OTHER DEMENTIAS | 2011年 / 26卷 / 07期
关键词
mild cognitive impairment; Alzheimer's disease; telephone assessment; screening instruments; VALIDATION; DEMENTIA; INTERVIEW; IDENTIFICATION; SCALE; TESTS;
D O I
10.1177/1533317511428151
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
This study determined the sensitivity and specificity of the telephone-administered Minnesota Cognitive Acuity Screen (MCAS) to distinguish mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from healthy controls (HCs) and from Alzheimer's disease (AD). A total of 100 individuals with MCI, 50 individuals with possible/probable AD, and 50 HCs were screened to exclude medical and psychiatric conditions affecting cognition. In-office evaluation included neuropsychological testing, neurologic examination, and neurodiagnostic work-up. Participants with AD obtained significantly lower MCAS total scores than participants with MCI, who in turn performed worse than the HC group. Sensitivity was 86% and specificity was 78% for distinguishing between MCI and HC. Sensitivity was 86% and specificity was 77% for discriminating between MCI and AD. Sensitivity was 91% and specificity was 78% for discriminating between impaired groups (MCI and AD) and HCs. Results suggest that the MCAS successfully discriminates MCI from HC and AD and has potential as an effective telephone-administered screening tool for memory disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 562
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 2010, ANAL ORDINAL CATEGOR, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470594001
[2]   Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves [J].
Akobeng, Anthony K. .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 (05) :644-647
[3]   CORNELL SCALE FOR DEPRESSION IN DEMENTIA [J].
ALEXOPOULOS, GS ;
ABRAMS, RC ;
YOUNG, RC ;
SHAMOIAN, CA .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 23 (03) :271-284
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, ASSESSMENT CLIN MANU
[5]  
Brandt, 1988, NEUROPSY NEUROPSY BE, V1, P111, DOI DOI 10.1001/ARCHNEUR.1993.00540060039014
[6]  
Brandt J., 2001, HOPKINS VERBAL LEARN
[7]   Potential for misclassification of mild cognitive impairment: A study of memory scores on the Wechsler Memory Scale-III in healthy older adults [J].
Brooks, Brian L. ;
Iverson, Grant L. ;
Holdnack, Jamesa. ;
Feldman, Howard H. .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 14 (03) :463-478
[8]   The Use of the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-M) in the Detection of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment [J].
Cook, Sarah E. ;
Marsiske, Michael ;
McCoy, Karin J. M. .
JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGY, 2009, 22 (02) :103-109
[9]   Validation of multi-stage telephone-based identification of cognitive impairment and dementia [J].
Crooks, VC ;
Clark, L ;
Petitti, DB ;
Chui, H ;
Chiu, V .
BMC NEUROLOGY, 2005, 5 (1)
[10]   Validation of the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Intact Elders [J].
Duff, Kevin ;
Beglinger, Leigh J. ;
Adams, William H. .
ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2009, 23 (01) :38-43