Prediction of wind drift and evaporation losses from sprinkler irrigation using neural network and multiple regression techniques

被引:39
作者
Al-Ghobari, Hussein M. [1 ]
El-Marazky, Mohamed S. [1 ,2 ]
Dewidar, Ahmed Z. [1 ,2 ]
Mattar, Mohamed A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Agr Engn Dept, Coll Food & Agr Sci, POB 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[2] Agr Engn Res Inst AEnRI, Agr Res Ctr, POB 256, Giza, Egypt
关键词
Sprinkler irrigation; Artificial neural network; Multiple linear regression; Evaporation and drift losses; ESTIMATING REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; AGRONOMICAL FACTORS; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; MODELS; UNIFORMITY; DESIGN; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2017.10.005
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Wind drift and evaporation losses (WDEL) play a significant role in the development of water conservation strategies in sprinkler irrigation. In this study, artificial neural network (ANN) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models were developed by taking data collected from published studies on predicted WDEL for several design, operational, and meteorological conditions of variables in sprinkler irrigation. Five combinations of input variables, including riser height, operating pressure, main nozzle diameter, auxiliary nozzle diameter (d(a)), water discharge by main nozzle, water discharge by auxiliary nozzles, wind speed (WS), air temperature, and relative humidity were used to create prediction models for WDEL. The ANN and MLR models were trained and tested on 70% and 30% of the data points, respectively. The accuracy of the models was assessed by the coefficients of correlation (r), overall indices of model performance (00, root mean square errors (RMSE), and mean absolute errors (MAE). Statistical results showed that the ANN and MLR models with all input variables had the best predicting capabilities. When comparing the results of different ANN and MLR models, it was seen that the ANN models had more success in predicting WDEL. The ANN models gave higher r (0.843-0.956) and 01(0.794-0.909) values, and lower RMSE (2.662%-4.886%) and MAE (2.197%-3.729%) values compared to the MLR models in the training stage. The MLR models' r values ranged from 0.794 to 0.864, 01 values ranged from 0.747 to 0.816, RMSE values ranged from 4.562% to 5.514%, and MAE values ranged from 3.513% to 4.414%. Furthermore, a contribution analysis found that the design parameter da and the climatic parameter WS were considered to obtain the most robust estimation model. It can be stated that the ANN model is a more suitable tool than the MLR model for the prediction of WDEL from sprinkler-irrigation. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 221
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Abo-Ghobar H. M., 1993, Journal of King Saud University, Agricultural Sciences, V5, P153
[2]   Field Assessment of Friction Head Loss and Friction Correction Factor Equations [J].
Alazba, A. A. ;
Mattar, M. A. ;
ElNesr, M. N. ;
Amin, M. T. .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (02) :166-176
[3]   Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application [J].
Basheer, IA ;
Hajmeer, M .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2000, 43 (01) :3-31
[4]  
Bavi A., 2009, Journal of Applied Sciences, V9, P597, DOI 10.3923/jas.2009.597.600
[5]   Irrigation performance measures: Efficiency and uniformity [J].
Burt, CM ;
Clemmens, AJ ;
Strelkoff, TS ;
Solomon, KH ;
Bliesner, RD ;
Hardy, LA ;
Howell, TA ;
Eisenhauer, DE .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 1997, 123 (06) :423-442
[6]   SIRIAS:: a simulation model for sprinkler irrigation -: I.: Description of model [J].
Carrión, P ;
Tarjuelo, JM ;
Montero, J .
IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2001, 20 (02) :73-84
[7]  
Christiansen J.E, 1942, U CALIF AGR EXP STN, V670
[8]  
Cigizoglu Hikmet Kerem, 2002, Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, V26, P27
[9]   Estimation, forecasting and extrapolation of river flows by artificial neural networks [J].
Cigizoglu, HK .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2003, 48 (03) :349-361
[10]   An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modelling [J].
Dawson, CW ;
Wilby, R .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1998, 43 (01) :47-66